Wow you went and said a whole lot of the same thing several times. "A pen is not a finger." That's just not relevant. A finger should work like a mouse drag with the primary button depressed. JJMack wrote You mean Photoshop should not work as designed... No, I mean the design is wrong. I understand you've likely been in Photoshop for a very long time, you've probably been using it since the '90s and doing it on various platforms... I hope. But that doesn't mean this isn't the 21st century, and for software that's by far the most expensive in the industry, all I'm saying is it should be better. What you're literally advocating for is the old way. I had an image I wanted to handwrite on, I have a Windows touchscreen, and regardless of the way I want to get that done, whether it's a finger, a capacitive stylus, or a resistive pen, it should work. There's really no excuse to explain why it can't tell the difference and just work, except blatant capitalist profiteering and laziness. Please don't defend that kind of business operation, otherwise some upstart is going to come along and eat your lunch. Don't believe me, go ask Tim at MySpace, or people who used to work at Atari, Sierra, 3DFX. Or go talk to Intel about their attempts at getting into mobile or into graphics cards. Or maybe go talk to Kodak, or what's left of them, when they disputed the usefulness of digital photography and with one decision ended their dynasty. There was a time where you'd go take a Kodak, not a picture. You're old enough, like me, to remember the "Kodak Moment." Ask your grandkids if they've even heard the word "kodak". By so easily dismissing touch, you're potentially throwing away a 28 year legacy of Photoshop with one decision.
... View more