Skip to main content
This topic has been closed for replies.

5 replies

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 17, 2021

May I add to the analysis that the white balance is wrong? In addition, it is not very sharp and the grass has this strange texture, when the noise reduction works poorly. But still, there is noise and washed out colours.

 

This looks a lot like a small sensor picture from either a drone or a phone.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 16, 2021

Hi @PhotoShootFood ,

This photo is over-saturated, noisy and have items that violates intellectual property. The grain around the edges gives the impression of being over-processed.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

 

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 16, 2021

I may be wrong, but it looks like a hellicopter is reflected in the right wing flap.  And the grass looks oversaturated to me. 

 

I don't like to purchase images that are too tightly cropped and not framed well.  If needed, I'll crop it myself to suit the project I'm working on.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 16, 2021

There are visible logos that need to be scrubbed out; however the composition also seems flawed - one wing tip is cut off and we're not seeing much of the body of the plane either.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Legend
August 16, 2021

You mean it was rejected? Adobe TOLD you the reason, what was it?