Skip to main content
reedesign1912
reedesign1912
Inspiring
October 1, 2021
Answered

Intellectual Property Refusal

  • October 1, 2021
  • 1 reply
  • 1143 views

Hello all, I need your wisdom and experience. This photo was rejected for Intellectual Property.  Is it the fact that the grain elevator itself is the intellectual property or is there some logo or other identifiable marker I am missing?  I certainly appreciate your feedback.  The landscape version of the photo was rejected for being a similar image, but I thought I would include both for your reference.

Thank you in advance for your feedback.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Jill_C

Including the name "Saskatchewan" makes it too easy to identify precisely where the silo is located. I believe it will be accepted if you scrub out those letters, making it a generic silo. 

1 reply

Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
October 1, 2021

Including the name "Saskatchewan" makes it too easy to identify precisely where the silo is located. I believe it will be accepted if you scrub out those letters, making it a generic silo. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
reedesign1912
reedesign1912Author
Inspiring
October 1, 2021

Thanks Jill_C, I didn't think having the Canadian province name of Saskatchewan on the building could be the issue, but you're probably right.  I appreciate the feedback.

Rob R, Photographer
Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity Expert
Community Expert
October 1, 2021

Here's the criteria for a property release:

"When your images depict recognizable places, buildings, artwork, cars, pets, or other property owned by someone else, you often need their permission before you submit the images to Adobe Stock. Property owners give you their permission by signing a property release."

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices