Skip to main content
Participant
February 26, 2022
Answered

What is the tech issue

  • February 26, 2022
  • 4 replies
  • 682 views

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Jill_C

1) black haloes around the edge of the beak, eagle's head, tree branches, possibly from oversharpening, blownout spots in the white feathers 

2) very noticeable chromatic aberration on the seagull

3) poor focus in the bird's head and excessive noise 

if you zoom in to 100-200% and inspect your images carefully the flaws are readily apparent.

 

4 replies

PepeCastro
Inspiring
February 27, 2022

I was not going to answer, it is not worth spending a keyboard for this, but... in the end I have decided and I expose my point of view. It is true that a photo and any work or artistic work have the obligation to achieve the closest thing to perfection, of course if I am photographing a product or a model in a studio where I have all the materials, cameras, filters, flashlights and I can check all the diaphragms and the necessary foci with the camera on a stable tripod, if that photographer takes out an aberration or a blur or overexposes etc. Well, if it is true that it should not be admitted, but if the photographer is out in the open in the middle of the field with the camera on an unstable tripod photographing an unpredictable object or animal, without knowing the time he will have before it is an animal he leaves, you cannot ask for the same performance since he will only have one opportunity to take the photo and that happens to all those who are dedicated to this section of photography, that is why I give my complete approval to these photos and how I consider that this error is much less than the total result. I believe that these photos should be included, not because of frivolity or goodwill. Would you reject the photo of the burned girl from Vietnam because it is blurred? well that

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 28, 2022

Everyone has their opinions. But Adobe Stock decides what's accepted.  We don't. 

All photos are evaluated the same, regardless of location or equipment.

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
PepeCastro
Inspiring
February 26, 2022
846 / 5,000
 

Resultados de traducción

This is like looking for a holy man, my question: to what extent does the perfect photograph exist? I think that, as in so many facets of life, certain details must also be forgiven if the total result is satisfactory enough, as well as assessing the effort to get the photo, I personally would not look to see if there are chromatic aberrations in the At the edges of the branches I would stop at the important thing in the majesty of that bald eagle, and the truth is that that magenta edge does not prevent me from contemplating it in the photo at all. My way of seeing this may be wrong, but it is certain that the perfect musician does not exist, nor the perfect athlete, nor the perfect singer, nor is anyone, why do you look for the perfect photographer? Let us be happy to see photos in which the virtues outweigh the defects
rustycutAuthor
Participant
February 26, 2022

I agree but do welcome the constructive critisism. Most photos  have flaws and somethimes I over process to correct them.

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 26, 2022

Focus, chromatic aberation and just plain over post processing.

Jill_C
Community Expert
Jill_CCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 26, 2022

1) black haloes around the edge of the beak, eagle's head, tree branches, possibly from oversharpening, blownout spots in the white feathers 

2) very noticeable chromatic aberration on the seagull

3) poor focus in the bird's head and excessive noise 

if you zoom in to 100-200% and inspect your images carefully the flaws are readily apparent.

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
rustycutAuthor
Participant
February 26, 2022

thank you for the CC