P: Lightroom Classic: FTP Upload broken after update

I don't know who, but a moderator misunderstanding my post has merged it into a thread (P: Lightroom Classic: FTP Upload broken after update), which I already wrote, I couldn't reply in. I still can't reply, so what good does that do?

Apart from not being able to reply in that thread, I specifically separated my post from that in order to keep the discussion separate. So why fiddle with it like this. The "original" topic was representing the same issue I have with the software itself, but it's implications is a separate matter.

Unmismoderate it, please.

See:

https://community.adobe.com/t5/using-the-community-discussions/adobe-support-community-guidelines/td-p/4788157

I don't know who, but a moderator misunderstanding my post has merged it into a thread (P: Lightroom Classic: FTP Upload broken after update), which I already wrote, I couldn't reply in. I still can't reply, so what good does that do?

Apart from not being able to reply in that thread, I specifically separated my post from that in order to keep the discussion separate. So why fiddle with it like this. The "original" topic was representing the same issue I have with the software itself, but it's implications is a separate matter.

Unmismoderate it, please.

I fully realize that I stepped on proud people's toes in the "P: Lightroom Classic: FTP Upload broken after update"-thread (this title contains the main issue I have with the software too), but that thread has now become un-reply-to-able, so I can't respond to them there. Well, I'm not very interested in a debate about that in itself anyway, but rather I want to continue my protest against the idea, that once Adobe's declared end of support for a piece of software, they can just leave subscribers hanging - at full price!! That's just not good enough.

So, Adobe! If you decide to leave paying customers hanging with faulty software, that's absolutely your choice and right. But you can't charge the same for a faulty program, when you just decide to abandon it for whatever reason you may have. How is it fair that I have to pay the same for my subscription to a faulty unsupported software, as someone subscribing to a fully functional - or at least supported, if it's not - program? I continue to pay full price every month, but now I'm just not getting the service that I subscribed to in the first place. I'm paying full price for software that you don't even consider worth your while, thus effectively rendering it obsolete - at the "fully supported" price.

What I'm saying is, either fix the software or give a fair reduction in it's price.

And I can't just upgrade to a newer OS, no matter how much of a no-brainer that might appear to be for some people here. I'm depending on other software and hardware too.

I have to use alternative methods to do what I was originally subscribing to this program to (also) be able to do.

Now, if no one here has the authority to do something about this, where do I direct my critisism?

I'm not concerned with your opinion.  Since others will likely read this thread after doing a search, it's important that the facts are clearly stated for them: Adobe only supports the current version of Lightroom Classic.  The license agreement (buried in the application's folders), says:

"5. Updates. ... you acknowledge that any obligation Adobe may have to support the previous version(s) may be ended upon the availability of the upgrade or update."

And as quoted above, this is clearly stated on the web site:

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/kb/supported-versions.html 

"Security and bug fixes are only provided for the current version."

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/system-requirements.html

"macOS Catalina (version 10.15) or later"

I'm sure he's fantastic help for many people, and I'm sure you are too.
But again, all that's irrelevant if you're not Adobe employees.
I have zero interest in wasting both my time and yours with a discussion that is completely irrelevant.
I need to know when it will be fixed, and if it won't, I need to know how we will be compensated. It's of course absolutely appauling to charge full pay for a subscription to a faulty piece of software.
They can fix it with an update or give those of us stuck with this version of the software a rebate.

Now, unless you are an Adobe employee, I have zero interest in your opinion on the matter. I don't mean that in a disrespectful way, but I do mean it. It's only a waste of your and my time, and will lead nowhere.

"Are you an Adobe employee, or do you have zero authority here?"

Bob is a frequent contributor here who has provided help and accurate information to very many others:

What he wrote was accurate:

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/kb/supported-versions.html 

"Security and bug fixes are only provided for the current version."

https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-classic/system-requirements.html

"macOS Catalina (version 10.15) or later"

Are you an Adobe employee, or do you have zero authority here?

It will never be fixed as both your version of Lightroom Classic and Mojave are no longer supported. 

There are other reasons for sticking with a particular OS, and I can't upgrade from Mojave to whatever pleases you. I'm subscribing to a piece of software (LR Classic) that does run on the OS I'm subscribing and running it on, but this feature is broken! I.e. it needs to be fixed.
When can we expect to see a solution?