Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
November 29, 2022
Question

Zeiss lensinfo not present with Canon R6, but present with Canon 6D

  • November 29, 2022
  • 1 reply
  • 1437 views

Hi all,

 

Ever since I got my Canon R6, Flickr won't display lens information in case 3rd party lenses (in this case Zeiss) are attached. I see this:


while I see this on Flickr when the picture was taken with a Canon 6D:

Flickr only shows what is present in the file, so I checked Lightroom, and I see that in case of 3rd party lenses (in this case a 135 apo sonnar) that no lensmaker info is shown in Lightroom, only the focal length on the R6:

In case of a picture taken with the 6D, I do see the lensinformation with all my Zeiss lenses:

When I attach Canon lenses (16-35, 70-200, 100-400 etc) to the R6, it works fine:
Flickr:

Lightroom:

So I don't think creating a ticket at Flickr makes sense, since it is already missing in the Lightroom library.

After that, I thought it was Adobe reading the wrong metadata fields from the camera, but I have been using LR for ages, and it doesn't matter which version of LR I use (of course I always keep it up to date), because I don't have this problem when using the 6D.

 

So the camera seems the only common denominator. I use firmware 1.4.0 on the R6 due to the AF-issues in later versions (hesitant to try 1.6.0). My guess is that Canon does not fill the proper metadata fields in-camera in case of 3rd party lenses. It works perfectly fine when a Canon lens is attached, so the camera does fill metadata fields.

At least the following 2 threads confirm what I have:

Topic 1

Topic 2

and both say it is a Canon bug....With the way Canon is keeping everything close to the chest nowadays, "forbidding" 3rd party lensmakers to use the RF-mount, I would not be surprised if Canon decided not to fill the lensmaker-details in the correct metadata fields in-camera in case the lens is non-Canon....But of course that is speculation...

 

I've contacted Canon CPS and they say they fill in the lensinformation fields exactly the same way on mirrorless bodies as on DSLR's. They say "EXIF is difficult and we cannot solve this" and they use Canon DPP as "bible" for my issue and they say "if it is not shown in DPP, then we cannot solve it".

In DPP4 it even does not show Zeiss lensinfo with the 6D, while in Lightroom or Flickr it does show Zeiss lensinfo...

Left: 6D + Zeiss 135 apo sonnar (on Flickr and Lightroom show the correct lensinfo)
Middle: R6 + 135 apo sonnar
Right: R6 + EF-100-400 II

 

I created 4 shots:

1: IMG.3306.CR3: R6 + Zeiss 135 apo sonnar
2: IMG.3307.CR3: R6 + Canon 70-200
3: IMG.3309.CR2: 6D + Zeiss 135 apo sonnar
4: IMG.3308.CR2: 6D + Canon 70-200

See below:

 

I can conclude the following:

- In Lightroom, the lensinfo shows correctly for the following combos: 6D+canon, 6D+Zeiss, R6+canon
- In DPP 4.16, the lensinfo shows correctly for the following combos: 6D+canon, R6+canon
- On Flickr, the lensinfo shows correctly for the following combos: 6D+canon, 6D+Zeiss, R6+canon

At least Lightroom is aligned with Flickr.

 

I also checked what I see in-camera (in case of the R6, because the 6D does not show lensinfo when playbacking images).
R6 + Zeiss 135 apo sonnar:

 

R6 + Canon 70-200:

I've created a topic on the Canon forums and found out that the program Darktable is using EXIV2 (github) for lens identification and there are several tags indicating the correct lensinfo, in this case LensType nr. 33 (33, "Carl Zeiss Apo-Sonnar T* 135mm f/2 ZE") but it is not used by Canon.

Here you see the different tags of my RAW file:

If I was using Darktable, I could manipulate it by a separate .ini file to read out the correct lens identification on tag nr 33.

I don't know if Adobe Lightroom makes use of EXIV2, but in case of the Canon 6D, adobe can read the lens identification correctly as shown in my examples.

 

Can adobe check the readouts for the correct tags, because it seems Flickr points to Adobe and Canon indicates they will not solve this, so Adobe seems the only party left to fix it....

This topic has been closed for replies.

1 reply

johnrellis
Genius
November 30, 2022

In the Metadata panel's Lens field, LR displays whatever the camera has written into the industry standard EXIF:LensModel metadata field (e.g. EF17-40mm f/4L USM), and if that is empty, the EXIF:LensInfo field (e.g. 17-40mm f/0).  Contrary to what Canon support told you, writing EXIF metadata is not "difficult" and hundreds of cameras do it correctly. (You generally have to take what any big company's support tells you with three grains of salt -- they're not trustworthy.)

 

If you upload a sample pic to Dropbox, Google Drive, or similar and post the sharing link here, I'll put it under the microscope and authoritatively confirm what's in the metadata and how LR is treating it.

Participating Frequently
November 30, 2022

i've replied to your message twice, but it keeps dissappearing from the forum (marked as spam?)

I've uploaded the 4 RAW files (straight from memory card) for you:

https://easyupload.io/m/ghk0ix

pass = lensexif

 

I hope you have some insights. I've executed exif tool and looked at the EXIF-tags and I see:

 

When I check the MakersNotes and Composite, I see multiple tags:
- Lens Type (2 occurences)
- Lens Info

- Lens Model (2 occurences)

- Lens ID


R6 + Zeiss (_MG_3306.CR3):

  • Lens Type: 33 (twice)
  • Lens Info: 135 135 0 0
  • Lens Model: not filled in (twice)
  • Lens ID: 33

 

6D + Zeiss (_MG_3309.CR2):

  • Lens Type: 33, 0
  • Lens Info: 135 135 0 0
  • Lens Model: 135mm (twice)
  • Lens ID: 33

 

R6 + Canon 70-200 (_MG_3307.CR3):

  • Lens Type: 251 (twice)
  • Lens Info: 70 200 0 0
  • Lens Model: EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM (twice)
  • Lens ID: 251

 

6D + Canon 70-200 (_MG_3308.CR3):

  • Lens Type: 251, 0
  • Lens Info: 70 200 0 0
  • Lens Model: EF70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM (twice)
  • Lens ID: 251

 

The case that is most curious is that of 6D + Zeiss (_IMG_3309.CR2), because that one shows the correct lensidentification in both Lightroom and Flickr while the Lens Model-tags in EXIFTOOL does not indicate that it is Zeiss 135 APO SONNAR....

 

I have this data, but I don't know what further to conclude...

johnrellis
Genius
November 30, 2022

"i've replied to your message twice, but it keeps dissappearing from the forum"

 

The third-party forum platform Adobe uses (Khorus) is mediocre at best, and there's a constant stream of such issues.  They've been reported to Adobe, which reports them to Khorus, which acts on them very, very slowly.