Images removed s it violates Adobe standards

[Richard36425402sfpk]

I have been trying to use firefly to create an underwater scene for a mermaid shoot; the mermaid model is approperiately covered. The first attempt was fine and I created a sandy underwater seabed. I then tried to generate flowing seaweed, Firefly generated these with no previews, when I clicked on the previews, the images had been removed for violating Adobe standarde. Can anyone shed any light on this? Descriptions were words like flowing tropical seaweed, and one shiny pearl.

I am just starting out with this and, although I appreciate it takes time, it's frustrating that my credits are being used up with no reward and I don't understand how I am violating any standards.

Many thanks, 

[Richard36425402sfpk]

Just to add, it has been hot and miss, somethine the generative images have worked fine and that is why there is seaweed in the image.

[Monika Gause]

Could it be the "weed" that is misleading Firefly?

[droopydog500]

Hello @Richard36425402sfpk,

Thanks for your message.  I am sorry you are having difficulty.

I think what you are saying is you took a photo of the mermaid and you have taken that photo into generative fill to add to the scene to make it a realistic underwater scene.  On some prompts, you are getting an error message. Are you getting this error or some other:

If so, could you please tell us your exact prompt?

Thanks,

    droopy

[Richard36425402sfpk]

Hello,

Yes, I am taking the mermaid image into firefly. One of my prompts was
“under water seabed of sand fading into the background”. When I generated
this I got a message saying that the image has been removed because it
violated Adobe community standards. It did eventually do it when I tried it
the next day. I then tried “flowing tropical seaweed” and again, got a
message saying image removed as it violated Adobe community standards.

All the best,

Richard

[droopydog500]

Hi @Richard36425402sfpk,

Ok, I do not think it is the prompt. I suspect what is happening is it looks at a resulting image and makes a determination if it thinks something like too much skin is showing. Based on past reports, I think that check can be over aggressive, and does not always generate consistent results. Not a great help for you, but the criteria for making this decision is evolving.

I would also note for Adobe folks reading this that in Generative fill, if you receive this message, there does not seem to be a way to flag it for incorrectly blocking as you can in Text to Image.

    droopy