Why does it become garbage?

[SpotSixSwaps]

I know the image is not of high quality, but the problem occurs even when it is of high quality. Here in the middle I want to delete an object and fill the surface with surrounding structure. And I expect this to happen without me writing a prompt (and it works well sometimes). But often firefly generates something that does not resemble the surrounding at all, and even if I write a prompt. How can I get firefly to always do the obvious and what sometimes succeeds?

[droopydog500]

Hello @SpotSixSwaps,

Thank you for your message. 

What process were you using?  I took the image into generative fill, selected the area:

and used the Remove function:

This is not perfect, but is the first generation. What results were you getting?

Thanks,
    droopy

[SpotSixSwaps]

I am not sure of what function i was using, but both of them (insert or remove) sometimes give these results. And I can see a pattern here, and it's the size. The smaller the area is, the more likely it is that it will be this kind of garbage.

[SpotSixSwaps]

Here's another example, and where I use "remove" ("Ta bort" in Swedish). You can see the three suggestions I get to choose from...

[droopydog500]

The best way to provide feedback on specific poor generations is to click on the elipsis ("...") in the generation and click thumbs down ("👎").  Then provide specific feedback:

    droopy

[SpotSixSwaps]

Here is another strange result of "remove". Firefly sggest a blue sign with some text or an animal of some kind.

[droopydog500]

I am curious, what was there originally that you were removing?

    droopy

[SpotSixSwaps]

It was nothing but floor tiles and the black baseboard, but with a slight distortion.