• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Wasn't Firefly supposed to be "ethically trained?"

Explorer ,
Jun 09, 2024 Jun 09, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Why has Adobe created a bunch of artwork in the style of Abigail Larson without compensating the artist? Why can Ian McQue, @Loishh, and several other artists all find their names in the Adobe Library when they never put any of their artwork up into Adobe stock for sale? I thought Adobe was supposed to be "ethically training" just on the images that Adobe owned in its own stock library. It appears now Adobe is being trained just as unethically as all the other unscrupulous Ai text-to-image generators. Very disappointing. Adobe you are now directly stealing and laundering the art of your own users. Please fix this.

Idea No status
TOPICS
Design , Imaging

Views

283

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Contributor , Jun 11, 2024 Jun 11, 2024

Hey Brad!

Those images are probably from Image farmers from MidJourney trying to make a buck in Adobe stock. The submission editors probably have no clue as to who these originated from. If I ran the zoo I would permaban those stock accounts for theft.

 

It's Probably best to post this in the Stock Contributors forum so Adobe can take action. I'm not an Adobe employee or compensated in any way so I can't contribute anymore to this discussion.

Votes

Translate

Translate
2 Comments
Contributor ,
Jun 11, 2024 Jun 11, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hey Brad!

Those images are probably from Image farmers from MidJourney trying to make a buck in Adobe stock. The submission editors probably have no clue as to who these originated from. If I ran the zoo I would permaban those stock accounts for theft.

 

It's Probably best to post this in the Stock Contributors forum so Adobe can take action. I'm not an Adobe employee or compensated in any way so I can't contribute anymore to this discussion.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Jun 12, 2024 Jun 12, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hello @heybrad007 ,

 

These images are in Adobe Stock. As Dave mentioned, it is extremely unlikely that Firefly was used to produce them. I agree with Dave that this is likely an issue with the person who submitted them to Adobe Stock and the approval process. I also recommend you discuss this in the Adobe Stock forum: Adobe Stock Community .

 

My best,

     droopy

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report