• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Watch folder created INDIVIDUAL source folders for EVERY FLIPPIN' CLIP!

LEGEND ,
Nov 14, 2022 Nov 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I just ran some clips through the Watch folder process.

 

This is incredibly frustrating and annoying!

 

1) THERE ARE NO upper level user settings for the behavior we need.

 

2) IT MOVED EVERY SOURCE CLIP from the original folder to it's own unique Source Folder ... making a NIGHTMARE problem for getting the clips back into one frickkin' folder.

 

Why oh why did it put EVERY clip into a separate folder? Who on earth would ever want that behavior?

 

Neil

TOPICS
Error or problem , Export or render , How to , Performance , Watch folders

Views

215

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Nov 21, 2022 Nov 21, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi Neil,
the reason for this is, if you put files with the same filename into the Watchfolder, they a) could overwrite the existing exported file or b) end up with a different filename (e.g. +_x), so the connection to the origin gets lost. Creating seperate unique folders with the actuall timestamp is currently the only possiblity to stay with the original filename.
For individuals you can often live without this additional folders due to your known filename uniqueness. For bigger scale with multiple user throwing random stuff is, we need seperation.
If you have a good solution for this situation, feel free to share. Currently having a preference to toggle this of still results in the danger of filename change or overwrite the output.
Sven S

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 21, 2022 Nov 21, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

NONE of those clips had the same name, ALL had timecode-based names, so every clip had a different name ...date/time in timecode.number, with every appended 3-digit number different.

 

So each had a unigue timecode to start the name due to it's start time being different, AND all had a different 3-digit end to the name.

 

So your comment does not seem to apply here.

 

If I'd had some of that cruddy AVCHD that is all "001" I would expect this behavior.

 

But with over forty uniquely named files I did not expect this behavior.

 

Neil

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines