Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
Locked
0

RenderMode (gpu) or (direct) - Can someone explain ?

Engaged ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

When in GPU mode .. I am seeing pretty good performance. There is a couple hiccups on the iPad3 using tweenMAX on large PNG's.    When I set renderMode to Direct ... performance takes a huge hit and looks like it's running at 10fps or something.

I keep reading about starling and using direct rendermode for awesome performance.  Is there something I need to do to achieve this ?   I am building with AIR 3.2 .. I'm building on the command line with the iOS5.1 SDK.      What else do I need to do to take advantage of getting greater performance ?

TOPICS
Development
9.9K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

If you're using Starling, or StageVideo, or Stage3D itself, you need Direct for it all to work correctly. If you're doing things that are less suited to GPU, such as character animations where every frame looks different, you may well get better performance with CPU than GPU.

What Direct does for those kinds of things is to transfer the changed area of the stage straight into the GPU. You will get much better performance than CPU, but depending on how much of the screen has changed you may or may not get better performance than GPU.

So, if too much is changing you may well get better performance with GPU.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

Thanks Colin.

So what would you suggest for an application that is a lot of tweenMAX usage.  adding movieclips to the stage..   more of an informational app.. with menu's etc ?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

Some of the usual tricks, like cacheasbitmap = true, might improve the CPU performance enough to compensate for the overhead of using Direct to copy so much to the GPU.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

I just tried my app as is and GPU performs 1000 times better than CPU.

So you're saying set cacheasbitmap = true on any of the heavy images I'm animating and I could see better performance using CPU than I am right now with GPU ?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Apr 03, 2012 Apr 03, 2012

So, you're getting about 1500 fps on GPU? Just kidding...

I was saying that if you have something that isn't optimized at all, running as CPU at 10 fps, it may get 15 fps on Direct without any changes. If you use normal CPU optimizing tricks, such as cacheasbitmap=true, the CPU performance might go to 20 fps, and Direct to 30 fps.

If you're doing normal GPU, I think that Flash does what it can to get bitmaps into the GPU for you, but if for example you had a walk cycle you would get bad performance unless you used a system such as Starling that dealt with sprite sheets, or you had code that preloaded the GPU with the frames of the walk cycle, and then cycled through those using code. That's where using Direct on its own might be worth trying, you get good enough performance from the original MovieClip or Graphics walk cycle without lots of work making sure that textures are loaded into the GPU.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Apr 04, 2012 Apr 04, 2012

You could also try something like this: http://www.greensock.com/blitmask/

No idea if it works for you, but is sounds awesome...

Anyone had any experience with blitmask and air?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guest
Apr 04, 2012 Apr 04, 2012

I've had great results with TweenLite so I assume other greensock things will work well with AIR.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Apr 04, 2012 Apr 04, 2012
LATEST

I am already using blitMask with throwProps for drag and throw techniques in another area.  It works great for that.   

I didnt want to have to use it for every single tween in my app though  

Much easier using the traditional tweenMax / tweenLite strings.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines