Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Dual mono and amplitude statistics

New Here ,
Jul 25, 2017 Jul 25, 2017

Hello everyone!

I had a weird problem when exporting dual mono from Audition. I need to get dual-ch mono track with absolutely identical L & R channels, matching -23 lufs.

After using Match Loudness I got an excellent result. Here it is:

1.jpg

All indicators in both columns are identical.

But after saving or exporting file i got a different result:

2.jpg

Minimum RMS Amp and Dynamic Range values differs for the left and right channels. I've already tried conert to mono, then back to stereo + match loudness. No result.

Is there any way to fix this?

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you!

379
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 25, 2017 Jul 25, 2017

The error you're looking at here is so small as to be completely insignificant, and is most likely a rounding error in the calculations. Humans have difficulty, even with steady tone, of spotting a 1dB difference - an error of 0.04 or 0.05dB is pretty much nothing. You'd even have trouble measuring this sort of difference on a precision meter!

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jul 26, 2017 Jul 26, 2017

Thanks for your reply! But, for example, we hand over a master to a television channel, which, based on their requirements, requests two absolutely identical audio channels.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 26, 2017 Jul 26, 2017
LATEST

What makes you think they won't be? This is only a calculation error, not a real one. If you want to prove this, copy one channel and invert-paste it over the other. If everything disappears, it's identical. If there was a real error, it would almost certainly show in the max and min sample values - and they are identical.

But as a general principle, if you want two identical tracks (although heaven knows why anybody would...) create the first one, and copy-paste it into the other channel, or wherever you want it, and don't bother messing around with exporting it - although I suspect that the result certainly should, and almost certainly will, be identical.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines