Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
3

P: Distraction Removal: People (CR & LrClassic)

Adobe Employee ,
Jan 16, 2025 Jan 16, 2025

Announcing a new feature now in Adobe Camera Raw (17.2) – Removal of Distracting People

Under the Remove dialog, under Distraction Removal, we have added an item called “People”.

 

This feature supports faster and easier detection and removal of distracting people in an image. It is offered as a Tech Preview in the Adobe Camera Raw Plugin-only and is available now. Please try it out and let us know what works well, what doesn’t work well, and anything that might improve the experience.

 

Thank you!

Peter Baust - Dir, Product Management

 

Posted by Rikk Flohr

 

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
TOPICS
macOS , Windows
12.2K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advisor ,
Feb 14, 2025 Feb 14, 2025

Curious as to a definition of distracting people. Tried out the new distraction removal feature on photos containing people ranging from a single person to a group of ten. Each time the program reports that it is unable to detect distracting people. The question is what is this feature aimed at for I haven't yet managed to find it?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 15, 2025 Feb 15, 2025

I have tried this on multiple pictures with people in varying locations, it has failed badly.

In image one with the red GTO it got the guy behind the car with the hat on and not the people in the upright and left of the image.

In the image with the red antique Ford it gets the guy on the back left with the 'Indians' shirt and none of the rest of the people.

In the image from the church, it identifies the woman with the ponytail in the lower right corner and NO one else.

 

If you need these in RAW to run your own test, please let me know.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Feb 15, 2025 Feb 15, 2025

La rimozione delle persone è buona o abbastanza buona, dipende dalle immagini. Non sono evidenti le puntine per ripristinare quelle persone, che non voglio eliminare. In ogni caso, una volta evidenziate le persone si dovrebbe avere la possibilità di scegliere quali, aggiungendo o togliendo con un pennello.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 16, 2025 Feb 16, 2025

I have a photo of the U.S. Capitol, one of a number of photos. There are lots of people in there. So this is a good test. It found a lot of people, great. But it has four key issues: (1) You can't adjust the Mask, so the nice couple I wanted to keep  got grouped with others I wanted to remove and the choice is All of None in a group; (2) I took the photo from in front of the Capitol, with the reflecting pool there and it didn't consider their reflections in the water; (3) it identified a traffic cone as a person; and (4) it missed someone.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 17, 2025 Feb 17, 2025

Removed all the tourists and replaced them with some blurred faceless person...somewhat bizzare.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 17, 2025 Feb 17, 2025

It did not detect any of the people in the background of this RAW file.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025

Thanks for sharing your test images. I am not able to reproduce the issue on my end. All the persons are correctly dedetected when running on my MBP.

 

Are you running this on Windows? Please follow https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/acr-gpu-faq.html#update to keep your GPU driver current. That is most likely the reason that you don't get any meaningful result.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025

I am running this on an iMac - everything IP to date. I tried removing the people again and get the message "Unable to find distracting people in this image".

When the image is opened in PS, the Remove tool gets rid of the people very successfully.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025

Ok. Does it detect any distraction people on other photos? 

 

Could you further share more details about your system info?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025

It works on some images but makes some inappropriate decisions on images such as this where I would expect it to identify the people in the background as "distractions", but not the official on the sideline.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Feb 20, 2025 Feb 20, 2025

Thanks. At least it is good to know that your machine configuration is not the issue. For the "test1" photo, are the original cropped raw file? We found a bug that if at least one of the distracting people’s masks is out of the crop bounds, the message “unable to find distracting people” appears in the people section, even though distracting people are present within the crop bounds. The workaround is to clear the crop and try again.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 18, 2025 Feb 18, 2025

I used it to remove one person on a bridge, while not perfect the result was okay. Would be better if it worked like the object selection tool and you could hover and select.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 19, 2025 Feb 19, 2025

Je découvre Génial

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 20, 2025 Feb 20, 2025

worked wel on my photo thx

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 20, 2025 Feb 20, 2025

I tried it today on several images, some with just one or two people and some with a lot of them. I got mixed results. On a picture of the Acropolis in Athens it removed around 12 people scattered around in front and did a good job. I found that if I opened a Raw file that had been previously edited in Lightroom and I had applied some masks to the people to adust their exposure it did nothing in Camera Raw, as if it didn't see them and they were front and center. Personally, I seldom use ACR so this new tool is not too important to me. My workflow starts with Lightroom and moves to Photoshop if necessary. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 20, 2025 Feb 20, 2025

Не особо коректно работает эта функция. Не понятно почему когда на групповом фото есть явно отвлекающий объект в кадре, он его просто не находит. Это намного легче и быстрее сделать инструментом удаления выделяя вручную, так еще будет и 3 генеративного варианта выбора. Как по мне функция не особо нужна.

Очень бы хотелось чтобы когда нибудь добавили в Camera Raw инструмент пластика. Вот это действительно нужный инструмент.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Feb 21, 2025 Feb 21, 2025

I like these tech previews and they hold great promise for the future once properly optimized and with developing AI. Right now, I am working on some travel photos, and dust is a real problem. I love the Heal Tool (working in Lightroom Classic), but working with it manually is extremely slow, laggy and un-optimized on large panoramas, even on a very beefy system (RTX 4090, 64gb RAM). This is thus a feature request for 1) Optimizing the Heal Tool for large images 2) Using AI to automatically detect and remove dust spots as a Distraction Removal. This would be an amazing time saver, and more practical to me than people removal.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 21, 2025 Feb 21, 2025

Did some testing. Works well on most photo's i tested but got also a result where Remove people in Camera Raw could not find distracting people while remove people in the Remove tool removed all of them perfectly.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 27, 2025 Feb 27, 2025

I'im really impressed!  I took a photo of a bunch of balloons at Disney but got the heads of several people in the way, The remove distraction feature captured and removed them cleanly

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 28, 2025 Feb 28, 2025

Definitely needs redefining before public release. It seems to use the same model as gen AI. Why let people use a separate device when they could mask it better than the new tool can. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Mar 05, 2025 Mar 05, 2025

bonjour 

cette application , suppression de personnes me donne totale satisfaction , photographe amateur  pour des photos de voyage  je peux supprimer tres facilement avec un resultat très satisfaisant 

cordialement 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Mar 08, 2025 Mar 08, 2025

I appreciate both the “Remove People” and “Remove Reflections” features. In my experience, the tool effectively removed two small groups of people from my image with impressive accuracy. I have yet to test its performance on larger crowds. Additionally, the “Remove Reflections” feature delivers excellent results, significantly enhancing image clarity.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Mar 10, 2025 Mar 10, 2025

Yep, it works alright.  Removed two unsuspecting folks in my shot.  The result was a full 5.  out of 5.  nice job Rikk.  and thanks.  Keep up the good work..

 

RSJ

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines