Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I feel a need to display the text before the audio on the timeline if the text is the same as the audio. Otherwise, I feel the viewer might get a little confused. If the text is displayed a few frames before the text to speech is heard I feel the brain can process is better.
Am I the only one who does this?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hmmm, I will NEVER have audio exactly the same as text on a slide (redundancy principle), with the exception of CC of course which has a different goal. It makes me think of all those bad presenters who are reading the text on their PPT-slides. (BTW that is what made me hate PPT). If I use text on a slide, it will be keywords, not sentences like in the audio. Sorry, that is my teacher's past.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I agree 100% with Lieve.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks David! Although I'm not an Apple fan, I watched Steve Job's presentations with awe!
Funny story: once in the classroom, students were giggling. I don't mind them having fun at all, but was puzzled and at the end I asked if I could get a clue to participate in the laughing? They pointed to my course pages on the table in front of me: they were upside down. I never looked at them so didn't notice...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I often use on-screen text as a way to call out key words or phrases within a sentence.
For example, if the narration says "Each time a customer enters your store, it's important to greet them."
Instead of the whole sentence being displayed on screen I will just have the text read "Greet the Customer" and the appearance of that text would be timed to coincide with the word greet in the narration.
I find this adds impact and makes it easy for your learner to remember the key points.
I don't actually dislike PowerPoint or any other presentation software for that matter. I just dislike the millions of people who use it so poorly.