Hi All,
I was trying to measure the performance overhead of using a
CFC versus using a plain cfinclude, and I have come up with some
really strange results. I hope someone can throw a light on what is
going on.
So basically I made 3 files.
1. testCFC.cfm: This is the file which I run and which either
contains a call to the compTest.cfc or includes the compTest.cfm
2. compTest.cfm: This is the included file and contains a
simple cfloop doing something
3. compTest.cfc: This is the cfc which contains the same
simple cfloop doing something.
I measured the tickcount before the cfc call and after the
cfc had returned and I got 210 ms.
When I did the cfinclude I got 150 ms. So it seems that the
CFC overhead was 33%. But that seemed unreasonably high, so I
measured the time taken to run the loop inside the cfc and that was
also 210 ms. Of something is amiss here because the time taken to
run the loop should be 150 ms (as in the simple cfinclude).
Am I doing something wring here??
The code for all the files is attached. I would really
appreciate if someone could throw a light into this. And any inputs
on the performance overheads of using CFC's would be very welcome.
Thanks a lot,
SS
Attach Code
testCFC.cfm:
<cfset application.compTest =
createObject("component","compTest")>
<cfset t1 = gettickcount()>
<cfset looptimes = application.compTest.doSomething()>
<!---cfinclude template="compTest.cfm"--->
<cfset timetaken = gettickcount() - t1>
<cfoutput>#timetaken#</cfoutput>
<cfoutput><br/>#looptimes#</cfoutput>
compTest.cfc:
<cfcomponent>
<cffunction name="doSomething">
<cfset looptick = gettickcount()>
<cfloop from="1" to="100000" index="i">
<cfset x = i*2 + 1>
</cfloop>
<cfset looptime = gettickcount() - looptick>
<cfreturn looptime>
</cffunction>
</cfcomponent>
compTest.cfm:
<cfloop from="1" to="100000" index="i">
<cfset x = i*2 + 1>
</cfloop>