• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Weird result when multiplying a number with a comma in it

Explorer ,
Jan 17, 2017 Jan 17, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I know how to get around this, but I thought it was really odd and wonder if anyone can explain it.

<cfoutput>#replace('$1,000','$','','all')*100#</cfoutput>

This was in a system that processes payments. It is just supposed to determine how many cents are in the total. I would expect this to return EITHER 100000 or an error because the comma makes it an invalid number format.  Instead, it returns 4273500!  What the heck is that?

I confirmed this on CF9, CF10, and CF11. Lucee returns an error ("Can't cast 1,000 to integer"), as I would expect.

Of course, it was poor programming to allow the comma to come through to begin with. That has been resolved, but I am still wondering what CF is even doing to get that number.

By the way, someone donated $1,000 to a charity through this system and was actually charged $42,735!

Views

330

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jan 17, 2017 Jan 17, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's a generous donation! I would have expected an error as well. That is strange.

Funnier, 8,000 and 1,8,000 also calculate into similar numbers and 0,000 throws a cannot parse into a number error -- the expected result of all the examples.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 18, 2017 Jan 18, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

tSpark wrote:

I know how to get around this, but I thought it was really odd and wonder if anyone can explain it.

<cfoutput>#replace('$1,000','$','','all')*100#</cfoutput>

...

By the way, someone donated $1,000 to a charity through this system and was actually charged $42,735!

$42735 - that is $1 for every single day that ever existed on the ColdFusion calendar, up until December 31, 2016. That is because, in essence, the *100 part is making your code to cast the string '1,000' to the date 31st December 2016. In fact, '1,000' is then cast to the number of days since ColdFusion's zero date, 30th December 1899.

Thus,

  <cfoutput>#'1,000' + 0#</cfoutput>

results in 42735, which is the same as

  <cfoutput>#datediff('d', createdate(1899,12,30), createdate(2016,12,31))#</cfoutput>

Similarly, '2,000'+0 is cast to the total number of days until the end of the first month. That is, until 31st January 2017. '3,000' + 0 is cast to the total number of days until the end of the second month. that is, until 28th February 2017. '4,000' + 0 is cast to the total number of days until the third month, that is, until 31st March 2017. And so on.

Another example:

'5,000' + 0: <cfoutput>#'5,000' + 0#</cfoutput><br>

datediff:  <cfoutput>#datediff('d', createdate(1899,12,30), createdate(2017,4,30))#</cfoutput>

Both will give you 42855. Weird but true. The moral here is to be careful when using ambiguous values in a weakly-typed language like ColdFusion.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jan 19, 2017 Jan 19, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Yeah, there is a article here about how Coldfusion converts its data types - ColdFusion Help | Data type conversion

I have found though that if things look off, its most likely just converted to its go-to data type - date

If it represents a number (for example, "1,000" or "12.36E-12"), it is converted to the corresponding number. If it represents a date-time (see next column), it is converted to the numeric value of the corresponding date-time object.

Clearly doesn't do what it says it does though

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jan 19, 2017 Jan 19, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Wow, go-to data type of date -- that is probably the last data type I would have expected. Strange, but I guess true.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Resources
Documentation