Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
1

css, 2 conflicting interests, and why I, You, and the Dw team get it wrong.

LEGEND ,
Oct 25, 2017 Oct 25, 2017

I could have posted this in 'that other' discussion, but this is not about 'splitting Dw up', more about 2 different types of user and why we will never 100% understand each other, but do need each other in one program.

First I would like to point out that I do not work for Adobe, do not take part in any decision making, and do not participate in Dw CAB or pre-release..

I read this article a few days ago, then looked at how the W3C specs are written, and took a really good look at this and other forums posts concerning web development. No I will not include web design because if you are writing any code then that is development -

https://alistapart.com/article/the-story-of-css-grid-from-its-creators

The passage in the above linked to article that got me thinking was -

"Peter Linss, then Co-Chair of the CSS Working Group, also suggested that they incorporate the concept of grid lines in the spec (instead of only talking about tracks). He believed including this familiar graphic design concept would make the spec more accessible to designers."

(It's about 2/3rds of the way down "The spec evolves" section)

The bit about making the spec more accessible to designers, really made me laugh, because if a designer can understand the specs for css grid layouts, then actually use those specs to produce a working rwd layout. without lots and lots of of trials and errors, they are a much better coder than I.

That is where I think the understanding of coders and the Dw team, regarding designers knowledge and requirements, even those who may like to code, is being miss understood, (and visa-versa).

The Principal Dw product manager, is also responsible for the Brackets project. This means that he is probably more of a coder than a designer, but like Peter Linss of the css working group thinking that the specs from css grid layouts makes the feature more accessible to designers, does it really?

This is no insult to the Principle Dw product manager, as I am just as guilty as he is of the following -

If you watch -

https://video.tv.adobe.com/v/19908t_876d7009-77fb-4a67-86bc-70475fddf88e/?autoplay=true

In the section about the roadmap, if you listen carefully you will hear an audience member ask the question, "Does Dw support Flexbox?". To which the answer is a simple, "Yes".

The answer should have been, "Yes, but only in code view", (Live view is irrelevant for this discussion).

Now why is the simple "Yes" wrong.

css is no longer the simple 260 properties it was in the 2.1 specs, but is now well over 700 properties, many of which like flexbox and css grid layouts, are not 'so simple' to understand, even for someone who has been reading specs and interpreting the meaning of them for years. For someone who does NOT know how to read and apply them, such as a designer who has no interest in keeping up with what is happening, beyond what is required of him/her for their work, simply needs more info, and I am not talking about telling them what the specs say, which is all that is currently provided.

They need visual info, or feedback of how the property will look and work, not after they have applied the property to their code, but before they apply it. Even coders learning how to apply many of these 'newer' css features, and then using them in their actual work, would I think appreciate such feedback, and that is to me what Dw is or should be about.

So why is Dw, me and you wrong?

Dw now simply assumes that everything is so easy when it comes to html, css js, and even php, without even looking at the terminology or the requirements of the modern web site or browser based app. It has stopped being about web development and more about the 'other' trends in  web development, (the 'what 3rd party feature is missing' ones). After all who creates custom sites anymore, now that we have frameworks and cms's. Code hinting, mvc, object/function referencing, databases, etc. etc. are things of the past no one requires them or would use them, and even if you would you can still use code view, but just remember to turn linting, code completion, hinting and anything else you may require off, (and that's if it is included).

Nothing in Dw is provided for anyone not willing to work with frameworks and cms's. Designers and developers are at war trying to get their requirements included, and the coder has become a 'dirty word' in these and a number of other forums when it comes to Dw, and trying to get ideas across and accepted that are not based on css 2.1 is no longer allowed.

We have all decided that, 'It's never going to happen', 'no one is listening', or that it does not matter what we say, but maybe it's time for everyone to take a good look at Dw anyway. Time for the Dw PM's, and other Dw/Adobe staff to take part in discussions, and all 'camps' to stop looking at Dw as 'their personal program', thinking that it should be based on past or their personal requirements, and as a complete heresy, maybe the Dw team should actually look at what is required without thinking 'they know best, and dam the rest'.

More to come!!!

14.5K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Employee , Nov 02, 2017 Nov 02, 2017

Thank you, Paula. The product team posted this info some time ago Message from the Dreamweaver Product team , and while I understand that this does not directly speak to the kinds of users, it is pretty much in line with what we have seen in DW updates so far and the direction it is headed. During my discussions with the team at MAX, I did not hear of anything that isn't already addressed in this post.

In my opinion, these improvements still stay true to the promise of helping designers that want

...
Translate
replies 189 Replies 189
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

I know exactly how you feel Birnou

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

pziecina  wrote

I know exactly how you feel Birnou

Must be darn easy these days to teach web design:

Day 1: (9.00am - 5.30pm)

Responsive Web Design Extensions, Apps, Add-ons and Plugins for Dreamweaver

Day 2: (9.00am - 5.30pm)

https://www.dmxzone.com/

Day 3: (9.00am - 9.05am)

http://learningforlife.fsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/certificateSampleDk.jpg

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

osgood_  wrote

pziecina   wrote

I know exactly how you feel Birnou

Must be darn easy these days to teach web design:

Day 1: (9.00am - 5.30pm)

Responsive Web Design Extensions, Apps, Add-ons and Plugins for Dreamweaver

Day 2: (9.00am - 5.30pm)

https://www.dmxzone.com/

Day 3: (9.00am - 9.05am)

http://learningforlife.fsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/certificateSampleDk.jpg

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but thanks for the link. We provide not only the tools to make Dreamweaver users more productive, we provide one-on-one telephone support and teaching. Perhaps this is not important to someone like you, but it is something Adobe is unable to provide. So it does have value. Your obsession with coding is, I believe a bit over the top, and perhaps not relevant to today's extensions, and this is where I disagree with your opinions. Our page layout tools, for example, are as valuable to coders as they are to beginners. We have widgets with features that I believe you could not program yourself... but if you understand JavaScript, you might learn some things. It's kind of like following a tune. Sometimes you need the first few notes to get you going.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

ALsp  wrote

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but thanks for the link. We provide not only the tools to make Dreamweaver users more productive, we provide one-on-one telephone support and teaching. Perhaps this is not important to someone like you, but it is something Adobe is unable to provide. So it does have value. Your obsession with coding is, I believe a bit over the top, and perhaps not relevant to today's extensions, and this is where I disagree with your opinions. Our page layout tools, for example, are as valuable to coders as they are to beginners. We have widgets with features that I believe you could not program yourself... but if you understand JavaScript, you might learn some things. It's kind of like following a tune. Sometimes you need the first few notes to get you going.

All I was trying to imply in a kind of British sense of humour - all you need to do is bag a few extensions and plugins, job done, knock out a few business cards and it's as easy as that, you're now a fully qualified knowledgeable web developer capable of .............

I make no apology for my 'obsession' with coding, it's what seperates the wheat from the chaff. You must surely understand that, otherwise you would not be capable of doing what you produce, or don't you know any coding? Are you using an extension to build your extensions or is there actually some kind of skilled coding involved? I believe so.

I think your whole world revolves around extensions and little else maybe, not every thing is build with an extension. Where does that leaves those people who are reliant on extensions, especially those wishing to advance in the field of web development, when it comes to trouble-shooting even some simple coding?

As I've said before I would not expect the kind of people that I think extenisons are mainly aimed at to be able to code or even want to code but for the likes of a few people around here who put themselves forward as 'developers' yet rely on extensions/frameworks it's unbelievable, but then again allowances have to be made it is the DW forum, I accept that.

No problem about the link. If I can help those that need an extension get to the right place that's all good as we'll, of course there's a market place for the right kind of person, who is not interested in coding or trying to understand how it all works.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

osgood_  wrote

ALsp   wrote

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but thanks for the link. We provide not only the tools to make Dreamweaver users more productive, we provide one-on-one telephone support and teaching. Perhaps this is not important to someone like you, but it is something Adobe is unable to provide. So it does have value. Your obsession with coding is, I believe a bit over the top, and perhaps not relevant to today's extensions, and this is where I disagree with your opinions. Our page layout tools, for example, are as valuable to coders as they are to beginners. We have widgets with features that I believe you could not program yourself... but if you understand JavaScript, you might learn some things. It's kind of like following a tune. Sometimes you need the first few notes to get you going.

All I was trying to imply in a kind of British sense of humour - all you need to do is bag a few extensions and plugins, job done, knock out a few business cards and it's as easy as that, you're now a fully qualified knowledgeable web developer capable of .............

I make no apology for my 'obsession' with coding, it's what seperates the wheat from the chaff. You must surely understand that, otherwise you would not be capable of doing what you produce, or don't you know any coding? Are you using an extension to build your extensions or is there actually some kind of skilled coding involved? I believe so.

I think your whole world revolves around extensions and little else maybe, not every thing is build with an extension. Where does that leaves those people who are reliant on extensions, especially those wishing to advance in the field of web development, when it comes to trouble-shooting even some simple coding?

As I've said before I would not expect the kind of people that I think extenisons are mainly aimed at to be able to code or even want to code but for the likes of a few people around here who put themselves forward as 'developers' yet rely on extensions/frameworks it's unbelievable, but then again allowances have to be made it is the DW forum, I accept that.

No problem about the link. If I can help those that need an extension get to the right place that's all good as we'll, of course there's a market place for the right kind of person, who is not interested in coding or trying to understand how it all works.

Nope. We know nothing about coding or programming. We just buy extensions that make extensions. Seriously? If I were a teenager, I would definitely be stringing together a bunch of OMGs

We have many, many customers who us Harmony, for instance... who are advanced CSS authors, capable of using Flex to lay out a page. You know... the ones you just insulted They use Harmony, because it makes there work easier and faster, while still  providing a means of quickly assigning custom user classes, or IDs, to take the tool way beyond what a non-coder would be able to.

Your arguments are not strong, Osgood. They really aren't.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

ALsp  wrote

Your arguments are not strong, Osgood. They really aren't.

We'll your arguments aren't exactly bullet proof given that you accept you need to know coding to do what you do or maybe 'when the boot fits' its ok.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

osgood_  wrote

ALsp   wrote

Your arguments are not strong, Osgood. They really aren't.

We'll your arguments aren't exactly bullet proof given that you accept you need to know coding to do what you do or maybe 'when the boot fits' its ok.

I'm sorry, but that makes no sense at all. Extension developers need to know coding, at a very high level, to make extensions. What does have to do with those who use extensions? The answer is obviously: nothing.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

ALsp  wrote

osgood_   wrote

ALsp    wrote

Your arguments are not strong, Osgood. They really aren't.

We'll your arguments aren't exactly bullet proof given that you accept you need to know coding to do what you do or maybe 'when the boot fits' its ok.

 

I'm sorry, but that makes no sense at all. Extension developers need to know coding, at a very high level, to make extensions. What does have to do with those who use extensions? The answer is obviously: nothing.

I would look around a bit and see what is happening out there Al. Yesterday I had to provide a very, very simple answer to a poster in this very forum who was using one of your extensions in their work. I assume because of that, or maybe as an attributing factor of using extensions, they didn't have the coding experience/knowledge required to put right what was a very simple problem..............so no, the ability to code has nothing to do with those that use extentions, someone else has to sort the problems out for them

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

osgood_  wrote

I would look around a bit and see what is happening out there Al. Yesterday I had to provide a very, very simple answer to a poster in this very forum who was using one of your extensions in their work. I assume because of that, or maybe as an attributing factor of using extensions, they didn't have the coding experience/knowledge required to put right what was a very simple problem..............so no, the ability to code has nothing to do with those that use extentions, someone else has to sort the problems out for them

This is what makes your arguments weak. First of all, a small number of our customers post on this forum, primarily because they either do not read our documentation and jump into using a tool, or they are under the illusion that this forum is the ultimate place for Dreamweaver support. Most of our customers email us. Many telephone us. The rest post on our forum. Since I do not know what this issue was, it may or may not be specifically related to our extension, or it could be related to an older extension. It could also be an issue clearly described in the product's documentation. The bottom line is that in most cases, a customer like that would get walked through a solution and come out the other side knowing far more about CSS and/or markup then they knew going in .

Of course, some of our users are not licensed, and might tend to seek support outside our domain.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

ALsp  wrote

This is what makes your arguments weak. First of all, a small number of our customers post on this forum, primarily because they either do not read our documentation and jump into using a tool, or they are under the illusion that this forum is the ultimate place for Dreamweaver support. Most of our customers email us. Many telephone us. The rest post on our forum. Since I do not know what this issue was, it may or may not be specifically related to our extension, or it could be related to an older extension. It could also be an issue clearly described in the product's documentation. The bottom line is that in most cases, a customer like that would get walked through a solution and come out the other side knowing far more about CSS and/or markup then they knew going in .

Of course, some of our users are not licensed, and might tend to seek support outside our domain.

Your components and extentions are a small part of the bigger picture in most cases. The particular issue was unrelated to your extension. I am suggesting that because they are relying on extensions to build or partly build a website that may also be directly related to why they did not have the relevant experience to correct a very small coding issue, not that you would care as long as the part of the website that uses your extension functions correctly.

If anything that makes my arguement water tight.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

osgood_  wrote

ALsp   wrote

This is what makes your arguments weak. First of all, a small number of our customers post on this forum, primarily because they either do not read our documentation and jump into using a tool, or they are under the illusion that this forum is the ultimate place for Dreamweaver support. Most of our customers email us. Many telephone us. The rest post on our forum. Since I do not know what this issue was, it may or may not be specifically related to our extension, or it could be related to an older extension. It could also be an issue clearly described in the product's documentation. The bottom line is that in most cases, a customer like that would get walked through a solution and come out the other side knowing far more about CSS and/or markup then they knew going in .

Of course, some of our users are not licensed, and might tend to seek support outside our domain.

Your components and extentions are a small part of the bigger picture in most cases. The particular issue was unrelated to your extension. I am suggesting that because they are relying on extensions to build or partly build a website that may also be directly related to why they did not have the relevant experience to correct a very small coding issue, not that you would care as long as the part of the website that uses your extension functions correctly.

If anything that makes my arguement water tight.

You are terribly insulting sometimes. But your argument leaks like a sieve. It usually does. Why don't you help us make an extension that you would use? Be helpful. Be civil. Perhaps you might even become more believable. I really hate to put you on the spot, but if you surprise me, and agree, then it might make you more of a builder and uniter, rather than a divider. Up for it?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

ALsp  wrote

osgood_   wrote

ALsp    wrote

You are terribly insulting sometimes. But your argument leaks like a sieve. It usually does. Why don't you help us make an extension that you would use? Be helpful. Be civil. Perhaps you might even become more believable. I really hate to put you on the spot, but if you surprise me, and agree, then it might make you more of a builder and uniter, rather than a divider. Up for it?

And you dont think youre not insulting with your carefully disguised insults?

You keep implying my arguement leaks like a sieve and yet offer no explanation as to why you think this OP and lots like them who rely on extensions, frameworks, plugins etc lack the basic skills needed to put something right when it goes wrong. I see it in the forum on a daily basis, you seem to want to deny that a problem exists.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

osgood_  wrote

ALsp   wrote

osgood_    wrote

ALsp     wrote

You are terribly insulting sometimes. But your argument leaks like a sieve. It usually does. Why don't you help us make an extension that you would use? Be helpful. Be civil. Perhaps you might even become more believable. I really hate to put you on the spot, but if you surprise me, and agree, then it might make you more of a builder and uniter, rather than a divider. Up for it?

And you dont think youre not insulting with your carefully disguised insults?

You keep implying my arguement leaks like a sieve and yet offer no explanation as to why you think this OP and lots like them who rely on extensions, frameworks, plugins etc lack the basic skills needed to put something right when it goes wrong. I see it in the forum on a daily basis, you seem to want to deny that a problem exists.

No, Osgood. I'm trying very hard not to insult you. I said your argument leaks like a sieve. I could have said your brain, but that would have been insulting . I think it's obvious that your insinuations about this customer of ours you helped lacks clarity and was intended to shade your opinions about extensions, ours in particular. That's what I find insulting. You seem to be inventing scenarios to sway people to your side. I have no idea why as this is not a debate. So my only conclusion is that you are compelled to cast a negative pall over extensions. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Extended Version?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

ALsp  wrot

No, Osgood. I'm trying very hard not to insult you. I said your argument leaks like a sieve. I could have said your brain, but that would have been insulting . I think it's obvious that your insinuations about this customer of ours you helped lacks clarity and was intended to shade your opinions about extensions, ours in particular. That's what I find insulting. You seem to be inventing scenarios to sway people to your side. I have no idea why as this is not a debate. So my only conclusion is that you are compelled to cast a negative pall over extensions. Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Extended Version?

I don't know whats not crystal clear about  the senario l cited. Its written down in black and white if you care to go through yesterdays posts. The only invention going on here is your denial in accepting there is a need to know at least some basic coding so when you come up against an issue you dont have to keep running to someone with the skills to sort it out. All lm try to establish is why you think coding is so bad and yet are hugely proud and continuosly gloat about how splendid you are it, that's what l term as a split personality, if you want to bring the discussion down to mental heath issues, which is not clever by the way.

Of course l expect you to defend extensions to within an inch of your life, that after all is  how you make a living. I would hope  people are bright enough to draw there own conclusions and make a decision based on their long term objectives...

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

Sorry, Osgood. You're getting more and more into the Twilight Zone here. I never said coding was not a useful skill. Nor would I ever do something for a living that I had to defend spuriously. We still enough customers to provide for our needs. And Project Seven is nether my nor Gerry's only source of income... not that it's your business.

You wrote:

"All lm try to establish is why you think coding is so bad and yet are hugely proud and continuosly gloat about how splendid you are it, that's what l term as a split personality"

That is insulting, patently false, and possibly a sign of mental instability... because I never said such things. I tried to be civil to you, but apparently that is not how you choose to engage those who disagree with you. All you need to do is say you don't agree. There is no reason to invent a case or to lie.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 05, 2017 Nov 05, 2017

ALsp  wrote

That is insulting, patently false, and possibly a sign of mental instability... because I never said such things. I tried to be civil to you, but apparently that is not how you choose to engage those who disagree with you. All you need to do is say you don't agree. There is no reason to invent a case or to lie.

What case have I invented Al, please do tell? You obviously have problems with short term memory loss. If I don't agree that's my preogative to do so based on my experience/s - when  have you actaully agreed with anything I've said. Mostly, apart form (Bootstrap) we don't share the same views so it's obvious we arent going to agree on a lot - it sounds like you are the one  with mental instabilities and insecurities if anyone challenges your views.

When have I ever mentioned that I particularly dislike your extensions as you alluded to in a previous post? Infact I credited your company in another post as producing some of the best extension available if someone feels the necessity to have to use them. I also backed your views about being allowed to post about your products in this forum.

This make no sense:

'I tried to be civil to you, but apparently that is not how you choose to engage those who disagree with you'

Sorry I'm none the wiser how you think I engage with those that disagree with me. If you want to elaborate please feel free to do so.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

There are as many different types of plugins/extension as there are skill levels.   You're making the assumption that all extensions are aimed at unskilled developers.   I take the opposite view based on personal experience.

1) I remember when DW had a  thriving Extension community behind it.   That's one of the main reasons I switched to DW from a competing product.  At the time, I was learning  CSS & Javascript,  I honestly  got more value from  dissecting a few client-side extensions than I did from any of the books & tutorials I'd read up to that point.   I used extensions as much to help me become a better coder as I did to expedite project completion. 

2) In the other product forums I visit, plugins are revered by advanced users as essential tools for doing professional  work.  That's not to say they are not capable of creating their own scripts, actions & presets (they do that too).   But when you count up the hours required to write complex algorithms, then test & fine tune them, it's  counter productive not to use 3rd party plugins when they can help you achieve better results with greater efficiency.  

3)  It was not so long ago that DW users like Paula and David Powers, Massimo Forti and others were writing custom DW Extensions and giving them away on their websites.   I had a great little extension that self-populated form Select lists with all the countries or all the states & provinces I needed.  A huge little time saver. 

I could go on an on but I won't.  I think you get the picture.

Nancy

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

3)  It was not so long ago that DW users like Paula and David Powers, Massimo Forti and others were writing custom DW Extensions and giving them away on their websites.

That's just it Nancy, without new up-to-date documentation, the return of the extension manager and an extension distribution system that we don't have to pay for, those days are gone.

Currently i have converted a stand-alone autoprefixer the i cannot get to work correctly without creating my own ui, as there is no documentation. I also have code that adds full flexbox, css grids, css multi-column support to the css designer, and an extension that adds all the missing html5/css code hints/completion to cs6, many of which are not included in Dw 2018.

I also have a semi-working Chrome dev tools that plugs-in to Dw, which includes a js de-bugger and all the Chrome tools.

None of which i can provide to anyone, as everything i mentioned in the first sentence is required to complete them.

The question is though, should i have to, or should these be included in Dw as standard, as i have no intention of updating or completing them now, even if Dw provided everything required.

I am retiring fully in January. I may continue in the forums, i may not, but except as an hobby web development i will let go.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

I honestly  got more value from  dissecting a few client-side extensions than I did from any of the books & tutorials I'd read up to that point.   I used extensions as much to help me become a better coder as I did to expedite project completion. 

We'll we all did that didn't we and soon realised 'hey I don't need this thing I thought was magic', it's only code and once I understand this code I can write my own code and expand upon this thing I have been using which wasnt quite right but I accepted it because I had no other option,  I could not code and didnt understand what this thing was doing, but it worked, I was happy, to a certain point.

This thing was complex because it had to address many options and issues that's why I found it difficult to understand. Once I have the knowledege to be able to isolated the bits that I actually wanted to use it was only a few lines of code, not 200 lines of code.

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

2) In the other product forums I visit, plugins are revered by advanced users as essential tools for doing professional  work.  That's not to say they are not capable of creating their own scripts, actions & presets (they do that too).   But when you count up the hours required to write complex algorithms, then test & fine tune them, it's  counter productive not to use 3rd party plugins when they can help you achieve better results with greater efficiency.  

I don't know these other forums so I don't know what kind of people we are talking about. The time spent writing your own solutions usually balances itself out with the time spent either going through someone elses code/css etc when you need to do some alterations, I find. No-one I can think of really wants to work with other peoples code, naming conventions, etc. I would not be doing this if I had to rely on extensions/frameworks as I would not feel genuine.

Client: "We do like this navigation you have produced for us Os"

Os: "Actually I didn't do that:,

Client: "Oh well, we do like the image gallery"

Os: "I didn't do that either",

Client: "The method of validation on the feedback form is very slick"

Os: "Nope";

Client: "Never mind the design is a cracker"

Os: "Sorry, template - but here's the invoice anyway";

Client: "Chuckle, we'll at least you did the invoice";

Os: "Nope, my secretary did".

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

3)  It was not so long ago that DW users like Paula and David Powers, Massimo Forti and others were writing custom DW Extensions and giving them away on their websites.   I had a great little extension that self-populated form Select lists with all the countries or all the states & provinces I needed.

I'm not taking about those kinds of extensions, they can be useful along with other scripts which remove blank lines from the code etc. I see them as superficial helpers, not something that forces particular workflows or method down your neck or as in the case of extensions can lead to lethagy leading to stagnation in ones progress and knowledege.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 03, 2017 Nov 03, 2017

Point 2 is nowhere near the same.  I'm sorry it's lost on you.  If you used other products in the Adobe line, you might better understand the disparity that exists between DW's relationship with plugins/extensions vs that of other Adobe products.   It's like night and day.

Point 3 is sadly not possible for all the reasons Paula mentioned.   But it was very cool for coders while it lasted .

Nancy

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

Point 2 is nowhere near the same.  I'm sorry it's lost on you.  If you used other products in the Adobe line, you might better understand the disparity that exists between DW's relationship with plugins/extensions vs that of other Adobe products.   It's like night and day.

It must be lost because l've never had a requirement .

I build what l would say was your typical website and its never been a requiement of mine to need a plugin or extension to do what l need.

I produce what is typical of dtp using Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign but have never had a requirement to use a plugin.

What kind of plugin would improve my work in say lnDesign?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

Let's say your client uses Google Docs in a collaborative setting.  DocsFlow dynamically merges  Google Docs document changes into your InDesign document so you can format, and make layout changes in InDesign, while you and others are editing content in real-time on Google Docs.  

InCatalog and InData work similarly only with databases & spreadsheets giving you the power to dynamically create printed catalogs and update prices, graphics or product details bi-directionally.  A must have for clients with really large product databases that change rapidly.

That's just 2 out of perhaps a hundred or more.

InDesign plug-ins, free third-party plug-ins

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

Thats more of a workflow aint it rather than an extention? Not that l or my clients in over 30 years in the business has ever needed such a workflow and l dont envisage it happening any time soon. I dont really see how a workflow is related to say an extention that creates a menu or image gallery, slider etc. Sounds to me more akin to Git, if thats your workflow and if you work in a team it may well be of use, l dont know lve never collaborated on a project other than getting a brief and delivering the solution.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

Indeed plugins can improve workflows.  They're not restricted solely to widgets. 

osgood_  wrote

Not that l or my clients in over 30 years in the business has ever needed such a workflow and l dont envisage it happening any time soon.

Kind of surprising.  You work with product databases don't you?  Are you saying you've never been asked to design a print catalog from the client's MySQL? 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Nov 04, 2017 Nov 04, 2017

Never, the print catalogue is always produced first. I get the task of getting the text out of Quark file and getting it into the database.

I would not really expect someone to code what is a workflow rather than what in my view is a component.

Like you mentioned in another post, a widget that shoves the complete UK or US zip codes into a select menu has to be positive. There in nothing to be gained inputting that information manually in contrast to manually inputting  the coding for a menu, slider or image gallery where you gain a considersble amount of knowledge and skill which can be used to further your progress.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines