Well, to give a bit of background information ... I feel the colleague in question is making a fundamental mistake by even considering converting his Frame files to .rtf, and that however thoughtful the conversion route might be he's more than likely to end up with inward-bound garbage and a lot of unforeseen problems when he tries to re-use the .rtf as a source for easy updates.<br /><br />I'll have another try at convincing him that for updates to a whole library of existing files he's better off distributing comment-enabled .pdf and accepting small changes as comments, larger changes as stand-alone .doc files. Works for me, with a pretty similar documentation set. [sideswipe - pity Adobe product A doesn't export comments direct to Adobe product B, but if ever there was a well-flogged dead horse it's integration between FM and Adobe <g>]<br /><br />I'll pass on your observations on Mif2Go, as well. Thanks for your input, which gives me a better understanding of (unflogged) horses for courses here.