Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi,
I am working on a structured document and intend to use the following numbering style.
1.1 (A:<$chapnum>.<n+>\t) [Style1]
1.1.1(A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n+> \t)[Style2]
1.1.1.1 (A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n>.<n+> \t)[Style3]
a) (B:<a+>)< =0> \t)[Style4]
and
i) B:<r+>) \t[Style5]
Only style 1 2 3 are suppose to be nested and style 4 and 5 are nested.
Problem is Style 4 doesn't reset even if :
Please help.
Here is a way to visualize how the styles relate to each other:
A:<$chapnum>.<n+>< =0>< =0>< =0> < =0>\t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n+> < =0>< =0> < =0> \t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n>. <n+> < =0> < =0> \t
A:< > < > < > < > <a+>) < =0> \t
A:< > < > < > < > < > <r+>) \t
Again, the < =0> building blocks are implied and not necessary to include, but I like to add them for clarity anyway. For example, if I am looking at the autonumber properties for Style 1, I can see that there are 4 other style
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If Style 4 is related to Styles 1 and 2 then they should all be part of the same series, in your case, A.
For just Styles 4 and 5 to work, you need this for Style 5:
B:< ><r+>)\t
I can show you how to incorporate Styles 4 and 5 into the A series if you tell me which of the first three Styles is supposed to reset Style 4.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Style 3 is supposed to reset style 4 and style 4 supposed to reset 5
Thank you in advance
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This should give you what you want:
A:<$chapnum>.<n+>\t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n+> \t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n>.<n+> \t
A:< >< >< >< ><a+>)< =0> \t
A:< >< >< >< >< ><r+>) \t
Note that the < =0> isn't necessary on Style 4, but I like to use it for clarity. It tells me that there is a style below (Style 5) that is getting reset by Style 4.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Here is a way to visualize how the styles relate to each other:
A:<$chapnum>.<n+>< =0>< =0>< =0> < =0>\t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n+> < =0>< =0> < =0> \t
A:<$chapnum>.<n>.<n>. <n+> < =0> < =0> \t
A:< > < > < > < > <a+>) < =0> \t
A:< > < > < > < > < > <r+>) \t
Again, the < =0> building blocks are implied and not necessary to include, but I like to add them for clarity anyway. For example, if I am looking at the autonumber properties for Style 1, I can see that there are 4 other styles in the series that are dependent on that numbering.
Note: The spacing in this post is for visualization purposes only. Don't use this spacing in your actual autonumber definitions.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you.
It works now.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Please mark my answer as Correct. Thank you.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you are isolating and have extra time, you may want to check out these blog posts:
http://frameautomation.com/framemaker-autonumber-primer/
http://frameautomation.com/advanced-autonumber-concepts/