We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.
My company has just updated to Framemaker 2017 in order to generate HTML5-based CSH. This is the first time we are trying to implement context-sensitive help for our software.
Our developers have taken a look at the HTML files I generated ("published") with Framemaker and say they cannot create a link to the markers because they are just listed as "CSH <number>" in the code. This number changes depending on the actual number of CSH markers before in the document.
The infamous map file contains the Map ID and the Map number. But neither of them appear in the generated HTML file. How are the developers supposed to link my markers to the application when the HTML file does not contain any unique information about them?
Can you explain in more detail what the map number does? Are we missing anything? Why do I use a unique Map ID in my markers when it does not appear anywhere in the HTML file? Why are there a Map ID, Map number AND this CSH number in the code?
Thank you for your help.
Yes, but that thread is about CSH in general.
I am specifically asking about the application side - I would like to know which ID/number is the right "target" for our developers to call the help. As I pointed out in the original message, there are three different kinds of info: The map ID, the map number and the number in the code (see screenshot above).
The system is like this:
#define <map ID> <map number>
<map ID>is the text that you have inserted into the CSH marker in your FM document.
<map number>is the ID that you agree on with your developer. It must be unique! They can use this ID in their software.
Now publish the help.
NOTE 1: You can also add and edit CSH markers via > Insert > Makers. Use the marker type "TopicAlias", which is the marker type that is added when going through > Insert > Publish Markers > Apply CSH Marker.
NOTE 2: You can also manage all markers with > View > Pods > Markers. Double-clicking in an entry "jumps" to the corresponding marker.
for HTML5 your answer might be still quite irritating:
HTML5 CSH users want to know where they can find the mapping between MAP-IDs (mapids) and the URLs, which is not shown in any .h file.
If the FM customer gets a list of mapids from the developers the FM customer creates TopicAlias Markers and inserts the corresponding mapid as the content of the marker as you descibed.
The file csh.js is located in the output folder within the the sub-folder whxdata .
The URL to a topic will be a combination of a fix starting point which is the location of the the index.html of the generated HTML files, combined with the individual relative path to the topic.
topicurl=\"book/chapter2/Description-19.htm#CSH_25\" /><item mapid=\"IFU_IFUMAP_VENTILATION_SETTINGS_VC_SIMV\" mapnum=\"2\"
Therefore on the developer part they must know this URL creation method only. The "mapid" is defiend by the developers anyway and there seems be no need for a .h file
Am I right?
In addition I would like to say: the complete URL a software developer must know for creating context sensitive HTML5 help is like this:
<mapid> = content of corresponding TopicAlias Marker.
I found this post when looking for information about making CSH from HTML 5.
1. Do the developers need to give me map IDs or not?
2. What do they have to do to call the help?
3. Can tool tips be integrated in any way from the HTML 5 help created? Ideas about how to do this?
OK, but here I am with a well-established book file that was already successfully used to publish context-sensitive help for our previous release, and now it is no longer generating or reading the .h file.
* my FM documents contain TopicAlias markers
* in the same directory as my FM book file there is a .h file called <my_book_file_name>.h
* this .h file contains definitions of mapIDs with unique numbers
* when I generate HTML5 output (even if I do it to a "clean" folder, so not overwriting old output), no .h file is generated.
* the csh.js file in my HTML5 output is empty
what am I missing?
I agree with you, that it would be great to see the original text from the TopicAlias marker.
I posted a feature request to also include that info as an addtional attribute in the output. You can vote for it here: