Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
0

FM 12 - Imported images fuzzy but OK in PDF output

New Here ,
Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

Does anyone know how to make the images inside my FM files look better?  The images are 150 dpi and look perfectly fine when I output to PDF.  I would like to have a better viewing experience inside FM.  Can I change any computer settings, etc. to fix this? Thanks, in advance, for advice.

321
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

LEGEND , Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

Photographic images at those settings should render reasonably well in FM. However, if these are screen captures where you have straight lines and text, then you're using the wrong format. JPG compression is lossy and will introduce artifacts (ringing/shadows/fuzzies) around text and straight line or high-contrast borders. You should use PNG for screen captures.

Translate
LEGEND ,
Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

What format are your images files? What resolution in FM (dpi setting) are you using? How big (pixel dimensions) is the typical image?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

Thank you for the reply...

I have tons of images, and they are jpg at 150 dpi.

The typical image size in pixel dimensiions is 904 pixels x 585 pixels

(total 1.5M). Image here is out of Photoshop. When in FrameMaker, I

usually scale down to 55-60%.

Thanks for taking the time to answer me.

Best regards.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

Photographic images at those settings should render reasonably well in FM. However, if these are screen captures where you have straight lines and text, then you're using the wrong format. JPG compression is lossy and will introduce artifacts (ringing/shadows/fuzzies) around text and straight line or high-contrast borders. You should use PNG for screen captures.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jan 06, 2015 Jan 06, 2015

Thanks for the info. I usually hate JPG files and now I know why. I'll

use PNG

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 07, 2015 Jan 07, 2015
LATEST

> You should use PNG for screen captures.

Or any graphics file format that offers either no compression, or a repeat-count compression (e.g. RLE, LZW, ZIP). These formats do not damage the image. I commonly use EPS or TIF.

Formats using curve-matching compression, like the DCT used in JPG, always introduce the artifacts that Arnis mentions, and can increase final file size, because curve-matching is really poor on sharp edges.

Another tip is to not resize by resampling when editing screenshots. Set the defined dpi to 72, or 100 (which is more typical for current screens), but adjust the size on the page by setting the scaling in FM. This generally passes in through the rendering unscathed by down-sampling settings that often apply a curve-matching compression.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines