• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Using pathItem.duplicate(Exception has occurred: 1200 an Illustrator error occurred: -108 ('ÿÿÿ”'))

Community Expert ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Having a strange issue. I am getting the following error when duplicating a pathitem to a differenet document. 

documents[0].pathItems[0].duplicate(documents[1].layers[0]);
The operation is being called in a loop, where I am opening document[1] and operating it, before closing it and moving onto the next doc[1]. The duplicate operation works correctly the first time I perform this function, but then fails on the second one, prompting this error. I have tried setting the activeDocument to doc[0] before duplication, but that doesn't work. 
Any thoughts? Appreciate it. 
 
TOPICS
Scripting

Views

254

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Oct 23, 2022 Oct 23, 2022

Hi @brianp311, I've rejigged your code, to my taste, and might be not appropriate to your exact needs, but I hope it will give us a platform to understand your problem (which I don't understand yet). Can you have a look and see if you can glean anything further?

- Mark

 

 

var designDoc = app.activeDocument,
    designLayer = designDoc.layers[0];

var collarColors = getCollarColors(designDoc, designLayer);

if (collarColors != undefined)
    alert('We have collarColors');
else
    alert('Nothing
...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Guide ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can you show what the loop looks like?  Which is the "index" document?  Is the other document constant? 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @brianp311, are the documents already open? If so, do the loop backwards, starting with the last document. And your source document must be document 0.

If not, get a reference to the opened doc and use that rather than documents[i].

A robust approach might be to write a little function that selects a document by looping over app.documents and comparing (for example) doc.name or doc.filePath.

Otherwise, posting a pared down script would help. 
- Mark

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It's a pretty complicated bit of code, but here are the relevnt snippets. The template doc is closed at the end of processDocs execution.

 

try {
        var designDoc = app.documents[0];
    } catch(e) {
        alert("Open the design doc and try again. It should be the only doc open.");
        return;
    }

var con = control(sizeObjs);
    if (con == null) return;
    var p = con.length;
    var x = 0;
    for(x; x < p; x++) {
        templateDoc = app.open(templateFiles[x]);
        processDocs(designDoc, templateDoc, con[x], sizeObjs[x]);
    }

var processDocs = function(designDoc, templateDoc, con, sizeO) {
 
     //move grouped items from Design doc to own layer on template doc
    try {
        var designLayer = templateDoc.layers.getByName("Design");
        designLayer.move(templateDoc, ElementPlacement.PLACEATEND);

    } catch(e) {
        var designLayer = templateDoc.layers.add();
        designLayer.name = "Design";
        designLayer.move(templateDoc, ElementPlacement.PLACEATEND);
    }
    app.selection = null;
    
    var gs = designDoc.layers[0].groupItems;
    var i = gs.length;
    var bckrx = /back/gi;
    var frx = /front/gi;
    var srx = /sleeve/gi;
    var tmpG;
    while(i--) {
        if (bckrx.test(gs[i].name)) {
            tmpG = gs[i].duplicate(designLayer);
            tmpG.hidden = gs[i].hidden;
            if (tmpG.pageItems) {
                try {
                    hidePathItems(tmpG.pageItems, gs[i].hidden);
                } catch(e) { 
                }
            }
        }

        if (frx.test(gs[i].name)) {
            tmpG = gs[i].duplicate(designLayer);
            tmpG.hidden = gs[i].hidden;
            if (tmpG.pageItems) {
                try {
                    hidePathItems(tmpG.pageItems, gs[i].hidden);
                } catch(e) { 
                }
            }
        }
        if (srx.test(gs[i].name)) {
            tmpG = gs[i].duplicate(designLayer);
            tmpG.hidden = gs[i].hidden;
            if (tmpG.pageItems) {
                try {
                    hidePathItems(tmpG.pageItems, gs[i].hidden);
                } catch(e) { 
                }
            }
        }
    }

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guide ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If I remove the undefined variables and strip it down to the most basic elements of the duplication, it works as expected.

// 1 doc open with 1 group
var designDoc = app.documents[0];
for(x = 0; x < 3; x++) {
    templateDoc = app.documents.add();
    processDocs();
}
function processDocs() {
    var designLayer = templateDoc.layers.add();
    designLayer.name = "Design";
    var gs = designDoc.layers[0].groupItems;
    var i = gs.length;
    var tmpG;
    while(i--) {
        tmpG = gs[i].duplicate(designLayer);
        }
    templateDoc.close();
}

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 16, 2022 Oct 16, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

So the logic there is sound, great work @femkeblanco. Perhaps Brian, your templateDoc is the problem. When it crashes, can you interrogate templateDoc in the debugger? Make sure it is the document you expect and has the correct file associated with it. Just throwing ideas around...

- Mark

 

P.S. another idea: try to create a pageItem in templateDoc and see if that works; something like:

var tf = designLayer.textFrames.add();
tf.name = tf.contents = 'did this work?';

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 23, 2022 Oct 23, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Apologies for the delayed reply. So, I think I have pinpointed the issue down to something specific. My main routine for duplicating files works, much like yours @femkeblanco . After I duplicate the main group items, I also target a specific object that can be either a PathItem or a GroupItem. If I exclude this routine from my script, everything works. If I include it, then, after successfully completing the first document, it throws the above-mentioned error on the second pass. 
I'm going to work to simplify the below code, but just wanted to close the loop on this. Thanks. 

 

var getCollarColors = function(designDoc, designLayer) {
    var collarColors = {
        main: {},
    };
    try {
        try {
            collarColors.main.obj = designDoc.layers[0].pathItems.getByName("Collar-Main");
            collarColors.main.isClipped = false;
        }
        catch(e) {
            try {
                collarColors.main.obj = designDoc.layers[0].groupItems.getByName("Collar-Main");
                collarColors.main.isClipped = true;
            }
            catch(e) {
                return undefined;
            }

        }
    } catch(e) {
        return undefined;
    }

        
    if (!collarColors.main.isClipped) {
        collarColors.main.color = collarColors.main.obj.fillColor;
        collarColors.main.isSpot = collarColors.main.obj.fillColor.typename == "SpotColor";
        collarColors.main.isGradient = collarColors.main.obj.fillColor.typename == "GradientColor"
    }
    if (collarColors.main.isClipped || collarColors.main.isGradient) {
        activeDocument = designDoc;
        collarColors.main.dupe = collarColors.main.obj.duplicate(designLayer);
    }
}

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 23, 2022 Oct 23, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @brianp311, I've rejigged your code, to my taste, and might be not appropriate to your exact needs, but I hope it will give us a platform to understand your problem (which I don't understand yet). Can you have a look and see if you can glean anything further?

- Mark

 

 

var designDoc = app.activeDocument,
    designLayer = designDoc.layers[0];

var collarColors = getCollarColors(designDoc, designLayer);

if (collarColors != undefined)
    alert('We have collarColors');
else
    alert('Nothing');


function getCollarColors(doc, layer) {

    // I don't like the try-catch approach,
    // preferring to offload to a fault-tolerant
    // function getByName. MUCH easier to read.
    var collarItem = getByName(layer.pathItems, "Collar-Main");

    if (collarItem == undefined)
        collarItem = getByName(layer.groupItems, "Collar-Main");

    if (collarItem == undefined)
        return undefined;

    // I think it is good form to fill out
    // your object notation even if many
    // properties are undefined, so that when
    // you go back to look over your code
    // it is easy to see what you intended.
    // I also suggest you don't create unnecessary
    // structure yet (eg. collarColors), and give
    // more explicit property name (eg. mainCollar vs main)
    var mainCollar = {
        obj: collarItem,
        color: undefined,
        isSpot: undefined,
        isGradient: undefined,
        dupe: undefined
    };

    // target collarItem not collarColors.main
    // 'clipped' no 'isClipped'
    if (!collarItem.clipped) {
        mainCollar.color = collarItem.fillColor;
        mainCollar.isSpot = collarItem.fillColor.typename == "SpotColor";
        mainCollar.isGradient = collarItem.fillColor.typename == "GradientColor"
    }

    if (collarItem.clipped || mainCollar.isGradient) {
        app.activeDocument = doc;
        mainCollar.dupe = collarItem.duplicate(layer);
    }

    // can give the structure here
    // (if needed, which I doubt)
    return { mainCollar: mainCollar };

};


function getByName(styles, name) {

    for (var i = 0; i < styles.length; i++)
        if (styles[i].name == name)
            return styles[i];

};

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 27, 2022 Oct 27, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thanks @m1b I refactored the code similarly to the way you suggested. Good call on initializing the undefined properties of the object. I was getting sloppy 🙂 I'll go ahead and mark this as resolved. I never could figure out what was going awry, but fixing up those objects to be a bit more clean seemed to have solved it. 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 27, 2022 Oct 27, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Glad you got it working. Yeah at some point clean code becomes the lazy (ie. best) option. You don't have to do so much thinking when the code makes instant sense! All the best. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines