Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello,
I have a rather large document that was proofread before I began layout. The proofreader added in Oxford commas, however I am not finding out that the client specifically requested to omit them. Is there a way to remove all Oxford commas without removing other commas before the word "and".
I've considered a simple find and change:
FIND:
, and
CHANGE TO:
and
but with that it will change any instance of a comma followed by the word "and".
Does anyone know if InDesign has a way of identifying only Oxford commas and removing them?
No -- Find/change can't tell the difference between Oxford and no-Oxford ", and".
P.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
No -- Find/change can't tell the difference between Oxford and no-Oxford ", and".
P.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I think that's going to need another human to repair the damage. You can use a pattern to find the candidates to check. I think it's beyond the abilities of regular expressions or any software ever made to recognise that "bring me a waiter, plate, and dessert" probably uses the Oxford comma, while "bring me a plate, waiter, and dessert" probably does not.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
markheart wrote
I am not finding out that the client specifically requested to omit them.
Then why are you endeavoring to do so?
Does anyone know if InDesign has a way of identifying only Oxford commas and removing them?
No, thankfully. If the matter was straightforward enough for that, their inclusion would likely not be in debate.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
John+Mensinger wrote
If the matter was straightforward enough for that, their inclusion would likely not be in debate.
From Wikipedia:
"There are people who embrace the Oxford comma, and people who don't, and I'll just say this: never get between these people when drink has been taken."
![]()
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hah! I suppose I'd be in the embrace camp. But really, that only means I use it; I would never tell someone else they must do as I do. The opponents I've encountered, however, (even one who was sober), insist it's structurally, aesthetically, and rhythmically incorrect, and are not quite as willing to be flexible about it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
https://forums.adobe.com/people/John+Mensinger wrote
markheart wrote
I am not finding out that the client specifically requested to omit them.
Then why are you endeavoring to do so?
Probably means “now” instead of “not”.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now