Copy link to clipboard
Copied
After perusing the community for posts about export file size from Lightroom this is what I have gleaned. People who care about the quality of their photos are complaining that such quality is impaired when exporting from Lightroom. This is true because photo printing services come back at me about some of my photos not having enough pixelation to print. When I look back at the original in Lightroom, it is fine for instance a 10.5 mb file will export at 786 KB which is unacceptable to print even at 5x7 let alone 8x10. I realize that size is changed upon cropping (which I do alot of) but quality should not change.
The answers provided are oblique at best and tend to blame the customer for whatever they are doing.
Can you provide a lucid explanation for why a printing company would come to the conclusion that the photo is not printable but you insist that the photo has not been reduced in quality (per these posts) and that we just don't understand the process.
I agree we don't understand and the reason is that it is not being explained. Please do so. Nothing in these posts has changed anything for my photos and I would appreciate clear direction or a reason why it can never be. I will act accordingly.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Before you will get any help at all you need to provide INFO about your images you are exporting.
What camera took these images?
How much are you cropping? What is the pixel dimensions of a typical cropped image you are trying to export?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
So many questions and no answers.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Yvonne254490371wg0 wrote:
So many questions and no answers.
What don't you understand about the correct answers provided?
Maybe a very old but still totally pertinent article on resolution basics is in order:
http://digitaldog.net/files/Resolution.pdf
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
you're not going to get the right answers until you provide better information about exactly what you're doing and how you're doing it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Work in Pixels! Figure out the size for the print you desire, then the number of pixels per inch and that's what you should export.
You want a 10" print and your lab wants 300 pixels per inch for their printer, you simply export at 3000 pixels along that axis.
Of course, you have to ask/find out what the lab asks for in terms of PPI and supply that/
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Digital file volume, whether it is expressed in KB, MB or GB, is not relevant for determining whether an image is suitable for printing at a particular size. What is important is the number of pixels along the sides that are available for each inch of print. Generally, the commercial machines are designed to work best when fed 300 pixels per inch and the caring/fussy photographer will submit his work with those dimensions. E.g., for an 8x10 ideally send 2400 x 3000 pixels. But the printer operators are fairly liberal in their demands because their intake software can resize the image to the needed 300 ppi. However, all resizing does have a price in quality and I imagine they would be reluctent to accept less than 150 ppi. Another factor that comes into play is that the larger the print, the greater the viewing distance and the harder it is to judge quality. Thus, for large wall-hanging prints they might accept 100 ppi.
If because of a small native size or extensive cropping, you have too few pixels, I believe it is better to use Lightroom's Export resizing than to leave it to the lab.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
After perusing the community for posts about export file size from Lightroom this is what I have gleaned. People who care about the quality of their photos are complaining that such quality is impaired when exporting from Lightroom. This is true because photo printing services come back at me about some of my photos not having enough pixelation to print. When I look back at the original in Lightroom, it is fine for instance a 10.5 mb file will export at 786 KB which is unacceptable to print even at 5x7 let alone 8x10. I realize that size is changed upon cropping (which I do alot of) but quality should not change.
I think what you have "gleaned" is completely wrong. So a couple of points:
Bottom line: getting high quality prints from Lightroom Classic not only is possible, but by following the proper procedures settings you shouldn't have the slightest problem.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
These points have already been mentioned but getting good quality prints from digital images is trivial. There are only a few rules:
You should absolutely ignore filesizes as mentioned already. With jpeg, the size depends on the complexity of the image as well as the quality setting. Did a quick test and a very complex landscape image with lots of detail scaled to 5x7 and quality 85 will be around 5 MB with these settings. A flower image with large bokeh out of focus areas will come in at 800kb. Both will print perfectly.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Yvonne254490371wg0 wrote:
I realize that size is changed upon cropping (which I do alot of) but quality should not change.
Are you saying that the quality is too low even if there are enough pixels in the image to meet the resolution requirements of the print? If that’s what’s happening, then the probable cause is that the JPEG compression quality is set too low.
Because if your 10.5 MB file will export at 786 KB JPEG at you set the JPEG Quality level to less than around 70, then the answer is to increase the Quality level until the visual quality is sufficient. Not the file size, but the visual quality. That 10MB raw file could export to a few hundred KB to several MB depending on how you set the JPEG quality level.
Just keep in mind that beyond a JPEG quality level of 85, the improvement in visual quality becomes harder to notice, but the file size goes up a lot more. That’s why many photo print services pros advise against setting JPEG Quality to 100.
And I have to agree with everyone else — you have got to stop equating file size with quality. Because if you have for example a 10MB file, how good that looks depends on the format and compression settings used, and that 10MB could also be reached using a wide combination of resolutions and pixel dimensions. 10MB coiuld be an awful-looking full page TIFF image, or a pristine looking JPEG image that takes up way more storage space than it should. The file size means nothing by itself…that is why everyone is asking for more details. It is that additional info — the real specs of the image — that will help answer the question. Since file size alone is not a reliable measure of quality.
You may not like the answers here, but the people answering are very experienced and knowledgeable. They are all just trying to help, and they know what they are talking about.