Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Posted by:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As @John R Ellis said the models used by Photoshop and ACR are the same; in CR they run on RAW data.
But Generative Fill is vastly superior in Ps.
. In Ps we can type instructions.
. In Ps we can feather the fill/selection.
. In Ps we can movw the fill without triggering a refresh, which allows users to place it better...I fixed this in LrC using the SDK but due to lack of feathering it doens't work well.
. In Ps we can generate many variations without loosing the ones we have already.
. In Ps we can copy and paste the Genrative Remove to other images as it is (John has implemeted this in his Plug-in "Copy Settings" but Adobe doesn't allow it)
. In Ps we can erase part of the variation without losing it : refine subtracting in LrC is simply horrible.
. In Ps variations are presented as thumbnails which is better for usability.
.
Gnrative fill is handicapped and vastly less usable in LrC than in Photoshop.
It's not a good port IMO.
.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
TLDR. - Photoshop generative AI works way better than the LrC