Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
1

P: Workflow changes to the new Denoise tool has made changes to Fuji x-trans rendering

Explorer ,
Jun 24, 2025 Jun 24, 2025

X-Trans files look clean and sharp in Capture One. They do not in Lightroom. This has been an established fact since the first X-Trans sensor. A workaround recently has been the denoise tool to convert RAF to DNG, which then presents a far cleaner and sharper image.

 

However, you have now removed this part of the process, killing the only way to get decent X-Trans image representation from within Lightroom.

 

Why?

TOPICS
macOS , Windows
238
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 24, 2025 Jun 24, 2025

The functionality that was present before is still there. Instead of an [Enhance] button, you now have a series of Checkboxes in the Detail section for Denoise/Raw Details. 

Screenshot 2025-06-24 at 2.26.18 PM.png

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 24, 2025 Jun 24, 2025

The functionality was the ability to convert to DNG which provided a much better compatibility and rendering of x-trans raw files.

 

A denoise slider on the raw image does nothing for this at all.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jun 24, 2025 Jun 24, 2025

To test my understanding, are you saying that running the new LR 14.4 Denoise on an RAF raw produces results inferior to doing Enhance > Denoise (creating a DNG) in prior versions?  

 

If my understanding is correct, it would be great to show that to Adobe by providing a sample raw showing that issue. Upload the file to Wetransfer, Dropbox, Google Drive or similar free service and post the sharing link here. 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Employee ,
Jun 26, 2025 Jun 26, 2025

What John says makes good sense. The Camera Raw team is asking if you have a Before update/after update example you can share with us so that they can evaluate the files. 

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Jun 26, 2025 Jun 26, 2025
LATEST

I see that you are using LrC to convert the RAF to a DNG. In your case via the Denoise tool. A couple of points (that may be out of date)

 

  • The new Denoise does not create a DNG by default. That is, unless you use Enhance (Enhance will create a DNG)
  • If you either use that method or use the Convert to DNG method, you are in effect using ACR (built into LrC) that has or had the underlying issue with RAF (Worms, overzealous sharpening) 
  • Many Fuji X owners who absolutely hate Adobe's treatment of RAF use third-party RAF to DNG converters. Specifically Irident X-Transformer. I would recommend that you try that out (a trial download is available)
  • Not all Fuji X owners find that ACR creates those worms any longer, and accept the LrC/ACR treatment. Although it is often recommended that you undo the lousy Adobe default in adding sharpening at import. (The preset /Classic/General/Zeroed helps)

 

 

https://www.iridient.com/products/xtransformer.html

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines