Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
May LrC has an issue reading the SN but it could be the camera has been repaired and a body from a different camera was used during the repair and the SN no longer matched the SN stored in ROM in the camera.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is the case with two of my cameras, a Lumix GX8 and a Lumix G9. I bought them both new and neither has been out for repair.
Unfortunately, I don't have the original boxes to compare the serial number on the box with the serial number on the body.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I downloaded a sample .rw2 for the GX8 from dpreview.com and examined it with Exiftool. LR is reading the serial number from the metadata field MakerNotes:InternalSerialNumber -- the camera doesn't store anything in the industry-standard EXIF:SerialNumber field, and I don't see any other fields containing likely serial numbers.
The serial number in your LR screenshot is decoded as (XEL) 2015:10:22 no. 0086, according to Exiftool.
This dpreviewcom thread has a post from a user who says Panasonic told him his G7 had an "external" serial number and an "internal" serial number recorded by firmware in photos, and that the two are not the same. The internal serial number records the assembly line, date, and camera number produced on that date.
So this is likely what you're seeing in LR with the GX8.
[Use the blue reply button under the first post to ensure replies sort properly.]
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks, John.
Seems it’s a camera manufacturer issue, and not unique to Panasonic, although it also suggests a total lack of industry standard practice for populating that field. I’m told Sony cameras place nothing in the serial number field, for example.
wso
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
"I’m told Sony cameras place nothing in the serial number field"
Just checked several Sony models in my catalog, and they don't have any serial numbers (in EXIF or MakerNotes).
[Use the blue reply button under the first post to ensure replies sort properly.]