Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Lightroom: Support third party cloud storage

12 Votes
Explorer ,
Nov 14, 2017 Nov 14, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I'm guessing this is a non starter, for many reasons!

As an Amazon Prime subscriber, I get unlimited photo storage, so I feel a little begrudged that I have to then pay for photo storage with Lightroom CC. It'd be great if you could choose your cloud service provider in the settings.

A couple of issues off the top of my head:
  • What would you do if you wanted to switch cloud provider in the settings? Would it need to download all the files and then upload them to a different provider?
  • You can obviously manage/delete/move the files directly in the cloud, which would play havoc with Lightroom.
  • I expect there could be issues with managing space.
I do however think it would be a real selling point for the service. Essentially using Lightroom CC as the front end and allowing users to manage the files in the cloud their way. It would also make backing up locally easier.
Idea No status
TOPICS
Desktop

Views

9

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
7 Comments
Adobe Community Professional ,
Nov 14, 2017 Nov 14, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think the whole point of LrCC (apart from the customers buying storage and a simpler UI) is to reduce the problems of sync, missing files etc. that many less experienced users may have had with Lightroom Classic.

They’re selling it as we’ll back up and look after your photos. You can do the organising.... but they won’t go missing.

I don’t see what Adobe would gain from it as it would be lost income and control.

No harm in asking though! (As the cost is more than I would have liked, after coming from their previous Cloud solution).

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Dec 16, 2017 Dec 16, 2017

Copy link to clipboard

Copied



Team,

Many of us have existing workflows and storage setups we're unlikely to change. Many successful SaaS vendors play nicely with cloud-storage providers.

It would benefit your user experience to incorporate support for OneDrive, OneDrive for Business, Google drive etc.

Is this in the roadmap?

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Feb 15, 2018 Feb 15, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I've got ~2tb of stuff in OneDrove. The fact that I'm lazy and not wanting to spend months re-uploading files to Lightroom CC is stopping me from using this service and sticking with Classic.

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Apr 06, 2018 Apr 06, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Now that NAS are supported via drive mappings, the features are there in LR CC desktop for us to use a local path to our cloud of choice.

Our cross-device experience won't be great.

I suspect they could leverage the LR CC sync feature and add functionality for authentication/authorisation to a third party cloud. Once the "on behalf of" or "delegate of" model is in place for sync to a third party service, it's not vastly different which service you use.

'll pay for a product and service, but I won't pay for storage in one ecosystem when I have my organisation setup to use another storage platform.
I have taken steps to secure and retain my data, I know it's safe. I don't believe Adobe have the maturity to match it nor will I pay twice.

If Adobe take their customers seriously and have undertaken basic research, I'd expect LR CC to support third-party clouds before it reaches feature parity.

Once we step from (example) LR CC iOS & OneDrive for Business to LR CC Desktop & OneDrive for Business, they will need to ensure that the user experience is optimised and sync works seamlessly. The challenge will be whether they treat the third party cloud as the source of authority or not.
I've seen it done before by smaller companies who put their customers first and am sure that Adobe have the skills and resources to implement the functionality.

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 07, 2018 Apr 07, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think what some people are missing is the fact that the Adobe cloud is far more than a simple storage solution. As the heart of the sync ecosystem it is also a powerful processing engine, being the place where much of the AI-related search stuff is run, along with auto-tagging, and where control of what the user requests on the local system is managed from, e.g. generating smart previews to replace local originals. It also contains the "master catalog" to control syncing of changes from/to all ecosystem end points (and manages recovery of all required data, images and changes, collections and albums, in the event of local loss).

I have no idea how easily, or even if, that processing could be done if the image data was actually stored on a third-party cloud. It's certainly not something I'd be happy to see happen.

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
New Here ,
Apr 29, 2018 Apr 29, 2018

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Underneath everything you described is storage. 🙂

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Engaged ,
Jul 09, 2019 Jul 09, 2019

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST


It would be great to be able to use my Google Drive cloud in Lr.I have more photographs than adobe Cloud can store

Translate

Translate

Report

Report