• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
5

Filter mask drilling all the way down to original image

Explorer ,
Mar 02, 2024 Mar 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am trying to restore one of my aunt's photos from Las Vegas from April 1975. In order to remove some dust and scratches, I looked up and followed this tutorial from Piximperfect.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tum_IwQ2bus

 

I went along okay until he added the copy of the first dust and scratches filter. What he calls Removal 2. As I wnt to paint on the Removal 2 mask, I thought it would just allow my Removal 1 to show through. Instead it appears to be also getting rid of Removal 1. 

 

Here's is a zoomed in part of my original photo so that you can see what I'm trying to get rid of. 

 

justinl26883563_3-1709416925260.png

 

 

Those blue specks. Here is after I added the first pass of the dust filter. 

 

justinl26883563_2-1709416876503.png

 

Here is with Removal 2 turned on (I really exaggerated it so that i could tell it was turned on. I'm not really gonna use this)

 

justinl26883563_0-1709417851260.png

 

 

If I use a black brush on the filter mask, I get this. 

 

justinl26883563_4-1709417142812.png

That looks identical to my very bottom layer. 😕 

 

I think the masks look okay. 

justinl26883563_5-1709417246297.png

My brush mode is normal, opacity is 100%, and my foreground/background colors are full black and white. Do masks not work on TIFs or something? That's what I scanned it in as. When I toggle R2 off, R1 shows up just fine. 

 

EDIT: Something just came to me. I'm not painting on a layer mask. All I'm doing is painting on the filter mask. Gah. One of those days where I can't think until i walk away from it. Thanks guys. 

TOPICS
Windows

Views

129

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Mar 02, 2024 Mar 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

It's wonderful news that you've managed to settle the issue.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 02, 2024 Mar 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I am definitely not a fan of that channel, and I am trying to be polite when writing this comment!

Have you tried Neural Filters ? Photo Restoration?  It's very effective.

image.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Mar 02, 2024 Mar 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's okay. We all have our opinions. You are not being rude at all by voicing yours. And no... I have not. I should try it. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 02, 2024 Mar 02, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Works like a magic trick.  Fixes old images with minimal softening, and does so in an instant.

Just another example of image Ai making difficult tasks easy.

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines