Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I liked to know if there are suggestions as to how I could get better results when I want to have human figures from GF - and I don't mean human figures with swimming suits, as "swimming suits" were determined obscene by Adobe GF; Mr. GF obviously didn't know that my photos were taken in a sea-side resort. So, to the point, I find that too often I get very strange creations from GF. I wonder that if I write "Human figure", I can even get creations like a trash bin. Mostly, to be onest, not such incorrect but very strange which just very remotely resembe human figures. But every now and then, realistic results too. So, is there any way to get decent-looking humans with GF? By now, I don't know the magic commands.
Thanks a lot, c.pfaffnenbichler! Really, I didn't figure out at all PS's GF and that of Airfly are clearly different in their capacity. The latter produces near to excellent results! Thanks!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Quite frankly I think Generative Fill is simply not as good as some other AI image generation-systems yet.
One factor for that may be a less ruthless approach to training material. There may naturally be others.
If Generative Fill does not live up to your expectations I would recommend that you try if Firefly (also Adobe) gives you (consistently) better results and if not you may have to turn to other applications for these tasks for the time being.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thanks a lot, c.pfaffnenbichler! Really, I didn't figure out at all PS's GF and that of Airfly are clearly different in their capacity. The latter produces near to excellent results! Thanks!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
First I wouldn't use "human figures" as a prompt. Try using "people" or "man", "woman", "couple".
Second, I would report any agregious results using the properties panel.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In fact, I used the words you indicate. As for reporting, that would be needed continuosly ...