In Photoshop, I normally edit my RAW images in 16 bit, but I accidentally edited an important image in 8 bit. I plan to print this image large (52"). This brought up a few questions:
- Is there any benefit at all to changing the color mode to 16 bit after all the editing is done? I believe the answer is no, but I want to be sure. I can't see a difference on my monitor.
- If I plan to export the final image is 8-bit, is there any advantage to doing the editing in 16 bit?
- Finally, is there a way to set the default setting for new projects in photoshop as 16 bit? I can't find that option in preferences, and it always opens new files as 8-bit by default.
Appreciate any help on these questions.
Copy link to clipboard
1. No, not unless you end up pasting high bit data into that original, then you'd convert.
2. Editing in high bit has advantages as discussed here:
3. Yes, you can create new documents to be in high bit (what Photoshop calls 16-bit) but if you're working with scans or camera originals, it has to come from those in high bit.
You can make a "New document" preset seen below or once you make a document, the dialog should be sticking (next time it will remember all those settings).
So my Epson 3880 (Mac only) has a high bit path (16-bit check box) and option in the driver. I can't see nor measure any difference in output sending 8-bits per color or the same document in 16-bits per color. Analysis: todays printers don't need more than 8-bits (good) per color.
My display is 12 bit (NEC SpectraView) and a few other manufacturers have this as well. With a full high bit video path, meaning the panel, video card, OS and application (so Photoshop fits that bill), one can get a full high bit video and one can see the difference using the correct kinds of documents like:
This has no bearing on the data you are editing. But if you see banding on-screen using high bit data, it's banding from the video path, not the data itself. So it is kind of nice to have a high bit video path but not something everyone needs. You may see slight banding at 100% preview that isn't in the data, that will not print this way. The banding is in the display path.
If you are plamning to do more editing and processing to smooth area using filters the use gradients 16 bit color may help in the smooting processing. Converting to 16 nit color is not going to gain colors the you lostt by converting Raw to 8bit rather than 16 bit color. Most Ptinters are 8bit color devices so you print file only needs to be 8 bit color. Most display and display adapters are 8bit color devives. While my nvidil quadro and device driver support 30bit bolor I can not use that 30bit color setting I do not have a High end wide gamit display. So I user 8bit color depth. 24bit color not 30 bit color. I do onvert camera RAW images to ProPhotoRGB 16bit color for editing images.
(Before anyone comes at me with, "WhY ARen'T yOU uSInG DarK MODe, brUH???," know that I'm not partial to going blind.)
There is no benefit to changing to 16-bit after editing.
But you can go back to the raw file (in Camera Raw), and open a new copy in 16-bit in Photoshop.
Click the text center bottom of the Camera Raw window to open the Workflow options, and make sure Depth is set to 16-bit.
This setting should stick unless you change it.
Editing should always be done in 16-bit, which gives you editing headroom, and prevents damage to the image.
See https://www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/16-bit/ for an in-depth discussion.
If you didn't see any difference on your monitor, try viewing the image at 100%, which you should always do to evaluate image quality.