• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Photoshops is slow and delayed when working with larger files

New Here ,
Dec 19, 2020 Dec 19, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi, I am loosing my mind over photoshop and after following countless tutorials and reading forums. So you are my last hope.
I have always used photoshop with small files problem free. Now I need to make a poster for print. 42x59 inches resolution at 300 and CMYK color.
My brushes lags and are so delayed. Even creating text and layers are delayed and really slow when using larger files. Its like Photoshop is close to crashing. I have a Macbook Pro from 2018. I have photoshop 2020.

According to Photoshops system requirements to macs im having all the recommended.
My processor: 2,2 GHz Intel Core i7
RAM: 16 GB 2400 MHz DDR4
Graphic: Radeon Pro 555X 4 GB

Do you have any ideas to fix my problem(s) and why im experiencing these issues? Do you just need an even bigger computer for large files?

Views

788

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Dec 19, 2020 Dec 19, 2020

That's a largish file (17 700 pixels long side), but by no means so large that there should be any speed issues on a decent computer. By your description, the likely issue is a buggy video driver.

 

That said, you don't need 300 ppi for large prints. That's the most persistent myth in the entire history of digital imaging. 300 ppi is for books and magazines to be seen at less than arm's length.

ppi1.png

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Dec 19, 2020 Dec 19, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That's a largish file (17 700 pixels long side), but by no means so large that there should be any speed issues on a decent computer. By your description, the likely issue is a buggy video driver.

 

That said, you don't need 300 ppi for large prints. That's the most persistent myth in the entire history of digital imaging. 300 ppi is for books and magazines to be seen at less than arm's length.

ppi1.png

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Dec 20, 2020 Dec 20, 2020

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi! Thanks a lot. It seemed like lowering the resolution did the job! Thanks. I wasn't aware of that. But it makes sense.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines