Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This article is written with a translator and the grammar may be awkward.
I recently saw the shortcomings of Intel Quick Sync.
This means that you get worse image quality than software acceleration.
Is this true?
I want to know about it, and I want to know the proper advantages and disadvantages of Quick Sync.
It simply speeds up the preview of the timeline or speeds up the rendering
I want to know the whole truth, not the one that covers the shortcomings.
Also, I'd like to know about this not the past but the latest in 2022.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Long-GOP formatted encoding means that there are conplete frames recorded every so many frames of video ... between 9-32, typically. Though I've seen longer. These are called "i-frames".
In-between, all that is recorded to disk is a matrix file of pixels that
So to decode and play this, or encode it to a new file, the system has to create several frames and work them as a group. It's not simply going down the clip decoding frame after frame or encoding frame after frame sequentially. It's far more complex a computing task.
It makes a smaller file though, AND ... specialized chips can be manufactured to do this as their only task. Which is why the camera makers love long-GOP. They can 'smallify' files real fast.
But it's absolute HADES to the computer when editing it. Because of all the extra computational work required.
QuickSync is a hardware chip built into some CPUs that is an attempt to do the same process as the one done by the chip in the cameras. However ... QuickSync by nature is a generalized H.264 tool, and won't be exactly the equal thing that the camera chip is. So it's fast ... but not always as accurate as you might like.
"Software only" in the render/export process refers to using the CPU standard processing tasks to compute the long-GOP data. Which is slower, but typically more accurate.
Some GPUs now even have some long-GOP capabilities. So ... it's complicated. Some CPUs, some GPUs have long-GOP chips in them. They each have slightly different capabilites and processes.
The best one around 'here' at 'splaining all this exactly per hardware bit is @RjL190365 ...
Neil
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
the latest version of Premiere is 2023.
Post moved to hardware forum.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There is very little difference in image quality between QuickSync encoding and software encoding at higher bitrates (say, 25 Mbps or greater). However, QuickSync hardware encoding falls apart quality-wise at lower bitrates (say, 3 Mbps).
11th- through 13th-Gen Intel CPUs' IGPs have a better QuickSync alogarithm than earlier Intel CPUs.
Hardware decoding, on the other hand, doesn't appear to hurt image quality.
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now