• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

In some cases, the CPU takes over the rendering task, causing the duration to increase.

New Here ,
Feb 19, 2024 Feb 19, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello everyone,

In Premiere Pro, during the rendering process, the GPU usually handles the work, and it operates quite quickly and efficiently. However, sometimes when I apply blending to a video, for example, when I apply an overlay to a smoke video and put it on top of the main video, during the final rendering, only this part seems to be handled by the CPU instead of the GPU. The GPU doesn't kick in until after this overlay section, and then the rendering process continues with high performance. If all processes were handled by the GPU, the rendering would finish incredibly quickly, but due to the CPU taking over, the rendering time is significantly prolonged.

My processor isn't a weak one, yet it struggles a lot during this overlay rendering process. I'm really curious about the reason behind this, and I haven't been able to figure it out yet. 

My system components are as follows: Intel i7 14700 KF, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, 32 GB RAM.

TOPICS
Export , Hardware or GPU , Performance

Views

287

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

LEGEND , Feb 19, 2024 Feb 19, 2024

First thing was I checked ... and that KF CPU doesn't have QuickSync listed as an "advanced technology" ... so it's not got hardware acceleration for long-GOp H.264/5 media. Though that is only part of the speed thing if you are working with long-GOP media. That 4070 does, so maybe that can make up for that.

 

So the other issue is the effect used. IF the effect is GPU accelerated, it's on their 'GPU Accelerated Effects' list. And I'd check that in their Help files. As if an effect is not on that

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Feb 19, 2024 Feb 19, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

First thing was I checked ... and that KF CPU doesn't have QuickSync listed as an "advanced technology" ... so it's not got hardware acceleration for long-GOp H.264/5 media. Though that is only part of the speed thing if you are working with long-GOP media. That 4070 does, so maybe that can make up for that.

 

So the other issue is the effect used. IF the effect is GPU accelerated, it's on their 'GPU Accelerated Effects' list. And I'd check that in their Help files. As if an effect is not on that list, all processing then goes to the CPU.

 

I am puzzled by your rig though ... a 20 core CPU, a 4070Ti, and only 32GB of RAM? That's quite a choking point on that CPU right there. I'd recommend 64GB as a starting point ...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 19, 2024 Feb 19, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I realized the lack of the Quick Sync feature thanks to you. Choosing a KF type processor, assuming that there would be no need for a CPU with integrated graphics in a system with Nvidia, I was clearly mistaken. You are also right about the RAM; I was planning to upgrade it anyway. I will support my system with dual channel 48x2=96GB. You've provided the most satisfying answer I've received so far, thank you.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines