Why would you want to use Motion over Vector Motion

[Robbie34135385e7mh]

I'm struggling to understand the difference between Motion and Vector Motion and don't know why you'd ever use Motion over Vector Motion. I'm coming across a lot of difficulty because of the Motion section and wish there was just one way to transform. 

I've only just understood that there's a difference and I've been using a shortcut that modifies the scale using 'Motion'. This works perfectly for quickly ammending the scale by +10 or -10, but I get the issues with the parameters, where media goes outside of the box etc. Now that I know this issue is coming from the Motion panel, it would be good for me to find a way to do that shortcut using the Vector Motion panel but it doesn't seem like there is a way.

I've also tried using the Transform, but when scaling up this just stacks loads of Transforms and there's no way to scale down using this method. 

[Ann Bens · Accepted solution]

Vector Motion is like Ae: continuous rasterization.

Motion in pixel based, which I never use in graphics.

I only adjust/transform the assets (text, shape etc) itself (to avoid going outside the box)

I only use vector motion to adjust the entire frame and all its content in one go.

[Peru Bob · Accepted solution]

See here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4vrdKlyKgs