Hi, I'm a little confused and need some clarity.
I prefer shooting and editing at the same frame rate that I decide to have the final export to,
but, in cases where you have to do slomo, higher frame rates are better, and you can always
use Premiere Pro's Optical Flow, but you should have high quality source footage to have
enough data (lighting, resolution etc..) for Optical Flow to analyze and give you the best results..
When it comes to mixed frame rates workflows, I always recommend Larry Jordan's here:
Great article thanks for the link.
50 fps and 24 fps mixed will give issues imo.
Why do you want 24 fps if you live in PAL-land. Stick to 50 fps (or 25 fps).
audio and digital film ( or vidio or whatever you call it ) are separate elements on film sets. A camera shoots to get the desired effect ( fps etc.) but sound mixer on set is jammed to timecode ( slate, camera, sound). so it's sync'd for post.
not sound in camera kid stuff.
hate to say it, but that's the way it is and you have to think about it for your timing and story telling.
I have to compromise and do what I can do to make stuff happen as a hobbyist... so mostly I slate stuff if I can,
when you adjust video with sound from camera you are adjusting BOTH elements... sound and video and frame rates and so on.. it's not magic ... you have to pre-vision ( imagine ) what's gonna happen when you do stuff.
you'll do great stuff so keep it up !
Thanks that makes perfect sense.
This project involves a couple of different supplied video footage at various frame rates so I'm looking for the best way forward.
I think I'll keep shooting everything at 50fps as this seems to make the most sence.
Thanks for info much appreciate it,