Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Broken Links to FM Files

New Here ,
Aug 05, 2008 Aug 05, 2008
I work in a small documentation department of two. We save all of our files on a network drive so we both have access to them. I have noticed that if I try to open a RH project that my partner created on her computer (or if she tries to open a project created on mine) that the link to the referenced FrameMaker book is broken. Why is this?

Nothing is different except that I have the shared drive mapped as a different drive letter on my computer. Is RH looking for Z:/projectfolder/projectname.book instead of just /projectfolder/projectname.book?

Attempting to update the link to the FrameMaker book causes RoboHelp to crash every time.

Didn't Adobe anticipate technical communicators working groups and sharing files on network drives?
655
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Guest
Mar 30, 2009 Mar 30, 2009
LATEST
Can anyone at Adobe address octechwriter's question of absolute or relative links?

I'm having a problem revising FM books that include an associated RH project, and it relates to this question. Here's a little background. The directory structure of our books looks like this:

<Top Level Folder>
FM files
<Subdirectory>
RH files and subdirectories

Now, when we revise a book, we create a copy of of the <Top Level Folder> and change the folder name. As a result, the links in the RH project in the newly pasted folder break, as they are still linked to the original folder. When this happens, I receive a broken link error in RH, which cannot be resolved. When I delete the book in RH and re-import it by reference, I receive an error.

Any ideas as to how this can be avoided? Having to recreate a RH project each time I revise a manual is completely unacceptable.

Adobe, will this be fixed in a patch, or are you going to force 1.x users to purchase an upgrade?
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Resources
RoboHelp Documentation
Download Adobe RoboHelp