Welcome Dialog

Welcome to the Community!

We have a brand new look! Take a tour with us and explore the latest updates on Adobe Support Community.


Robohelp 2020 Patch 5 background-image: url issue

New Here ,
Sep 09, 2021 Sep 09, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi.  A question for the forum.

 

I select background image for the layout and generate WebHelp.  My image is not showing up.  I look at the layout.css file that is generated and it shows background-image: url(Fusebox logo.jpg); 

 

Notice ther are no tick marks around the image file name.  Chrome Developer tools complains as Invalid Property Value.

 

If I add tick marks around the file name manually in layout.css file like background-image: url('Fusebox logo.jpg'); it works and the image shows in the browser and Developer tools doesn't complain.

 

Is this a bug in Robohelp Patch 5?  In Robohelp patch 4 it adds the tick marks around the image name and works as I have an old project that is generated in patch 4.

 

If anyonme thinks it is a bug is there a way to remove patch 5 and revert to patch 4? Any way to submit a bug?

 

Anyone who can help please advise.

 

Thanks

 

Kevin

Views

20

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Sep 09, 2021 Sep 09, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You can request features and report issues here: https://tracker.adobe.com/
Post the item number in the discussion so people can easily vote if they want the same functionality.

 

In the meantime, you might be able to manually add the quotes in the skin. Try that and see if it works. Otherwise you can uninstall robohelp and install update 4 from here: 

https://helpx.adobe.com/robohelp/kb/robohelp-downloads.html

 

On a side note, you're most likely generating a Responsive HTML5 output, as the webhelp output from Classic was not included in RH2020. The name of your output preset would not have been changed, but the underlying technology was.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 10, 2021 Sep 10, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thanks.  I figured it out.  If I remove the image file name spaces then it works with no tick marks in the layout.css file.

Kevin 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Resources
RoboHelp Documentation