The answer is not to tag or exclude AI images from searches; the answer is to review images before they are posted. Have a look at #583461015. How can Adobe charge for that that image? Shame on them.
Contributor1 • Adobe Employee, Dec 08, 2023Dec 08, 2023
Hello @David34119419tp47, I see the issue you're referencing and have sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.
The answer is not to tag or exclude AI images from searches; the answer is to review images before they are posted. Have a look at #583461015. How can Adobe charge for that that image? Shame on them.
Tagging is one problem, bad assets are a second one. Contributors are currently complaining that they get more refusals, so hopefully, Adobe's moderators are doing a better job with sorting out flawed assets at the beginning.
I find it also very dishonest from contributors to submit assets with highly visible defects, and then hoping that the moderator would let them pass. This is bad for all of us, who invest considerable time in cleaning up our assets to give buyers a good experience and trust in the system.
Let's get @Contributor1 checking this. I think, this entire series need to go. And I've seen multiple other assets that should be checked again. And this contributor has 38 pages of assets. That's work ahead.
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Hello @David34119419tp47, I see the issue you're referencing and have sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.