• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

Re: AI generated images

Community Beginner ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The answer is not to tag or exclude AI images from searches; the answer is to review images before they are posted. Have a look at #583461015. How can Adobe charge for that that image?  Shame on them.

 

[moderator detached this from a thread to be able to move it to the bugs section. For context, see here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-discussions/ai-generated-images/td-p/13768047]

Bug Acknowledged
TOPICS
Asset Quality

Views

162

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Pinned Reply

Adobe Employee , Dec 08, 2023 Dec 08, 2023

Hello @David34119419tp47, I see the issue you're referencing and have sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

Status Acknowledged

Votes

Translate

Translate
6 Comments
Community Expert ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Indeed that image is a mess....

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The entire series is.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote

The answer is not to tag or exclude AI images from searches; the answer is to review images before they are posted. Have a look at #583461015. How can Adobe charge for that that image?  Shame on them.


By @David34119419tp47

Tagging is one problem, bad assets are a second one. Contributors are currently complaining that they get more refusals, so hopefully, Adobe's moderators are doing a better job with sorting out flawed assets at the beginning. 

 

I find it also very dishonest from contributors to submit assets with highly visible defects, and then hoping that the moderator would let them pass. This is bad for all of us, who invest considerable time in cleaning up our assets to give buyers a good experience and trust in the system. 

 

Let's get @Contributor1 checking this. I think, this entire series need to go. And I've seen multiple other assets that should be checked again. And this contributor has 38 pages of assets. That's work ahead.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That set of images showed up a few months ago. I'm surprised they're still available.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community Expert ,
Dec 07, 2023 Dec 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@daniellei4510 ,

Nobody complained until now.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Adobe Employee ,
Dec 08, 2023 Dec 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hello @David34119419tp47, I see the issue you're referencing and have sent these details to be reviewed internally. Thank you for the report and sorry for the problem with the image.

Status Acknowledged

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Resources
Buy Adobe Stock
Getting Started