Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I assume these were rejected for technical issues. It's best fro you to state the rejection reason when you post here.
IMG_9772.jpg - depth of field appears to be shallow causing parts of the image to be out of focus; it's also underexposed.
IMG_9780.jpg Underexposed
IMG_9781.jpg - partly underexposed, and it's difficult to see if those underexposed areas are in focus
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I assume these were rejected for technical issues. It's best fro you to state the rejection reason when you post here.
IMG_9772.jpg - depth of field appears to be shallow causing parts of the image to be out of focus; it's also underexposed.
IMG_9780.jpg Underexposed
IMG_9781.jpg - partly underexposed, and it's difficult to see if those underexposed areas are in focus
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
9781: Look at the histogram. The histogram shows that the picture is clearly underexposed.
Whites are missing and highlights are missing. Focus is clearly also a problem, the upper part out of focus, the lower part is in focus. With an asset like this, you expect the focus to be even and all parts in focus.
9780: Look at the histogram:
Even more underexposed than 9781.
Focus is OK, I think.
9772: The upper part is slightly out of focus.
The picture is underexposed:
They are all nice textures, but you need to work with the histogram to get the exposure right. You also need to work on your focussing, either by taking differently focussed pictures and assembling them (focus stacking) or directly out of the camera.
The pictures are enjoyable textures.