Adobe Stockのクリエイターとして上記3点の写真を含む計9点の写真を審査に出したところ、全ての写真が却下されてしまいました。
Adobe側からの回答は以下の通りです。
“画像をご提出いただき、ありがとうございます。残念ながら、この画像はアドビの品質基準を満たしていないため、コレクションに追加できませんでした。
画像の品質に影響がある一般的な問題には、露出の問題、ソフトフォーカス、過剰なフィルタリングまたはアーティファクト / ノイズなどがあります。技術的な要件 に関する詳細を
具体的にどのような改善を行えばいいのでしょうか？
Adobe Stockは初心者のため教えていただけますと幸いです。
宜しくお願いします。
5
Replies
Soft focus, underexposure, and editing errors:
Sorry for the troubles, but contributors are supposed to know photography. It is not a photography school. You should try to adhere to a photo club and take photography courses.
Please note also, that flower pictures are abundantly represented in the database. As they are very patient subjects, and a good occasion to learn much about photography, you should not expect to get much return on your flower pictures, even when accepted.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Oh, there is nothing wrong with this soft focus for artistic use. Indeed, generations of photographers did smear filter glasses with get to get this dreamy look. It is just not suitable for stock. Indeed, if the customer needs this soft look, they can apply this in just a few seconds.
What isn't, however, covered, even with your artistic art editing is this Photoshop fault, that I pointed out:
(To be clear: I have applied an exaggerated curve in Photoshop, to bring out the defect in a more clear manner.)
AdChoices
