添付画像のような様々なAI生成イラストを約50枚審査しましたが、全て「品質の問題」により却下されました。
AIによって生成されたイラストはphotoshopで解像度を高くアップしています。
何を改善すれば審査が通れるようになるかアドバイスをください。
カメラでフォックスた写真については200枚ほど審査が通ってリリースされているので、かなり重要な点は理解しているつもりではありますが、イラストでの審査ルールは写真とは違うのかなども教えますしていただければ幸いです。
6 Correct answers
For the surfer, maybe the four fingers instead of five?
Look at the finger tips on thge last image.
The surfer doesn't have enough fingers.
The lace on the cami isn't drawn properly.
The fingers and keyboard are flawed.
You must zoom in at least 100% on every image and carefully inspect. Edit out the flaws or delete the image.
About 200 Fox photos on the camera have been reviewed and released, so I think I understand quite important points, but I would appreciate it if you could tell me whether the judging rules in illustrations are different from photos.
By @yuichiy29972537
I suppose you did not check for the typical generative AI errors. Which proves, by the way, that you did not inspect your pictures at 100%. Generative AI is getting better, but it is still bad with some things, like hands, faces, geometric o
...
Zoom in and inspect carefully. The lines are jagged and poorly drawn.
A lot of weird shapes that don't make sense, croocked lines that should be straight. I haven't circuled all the issues but they are easy to spot at 100%. Seems we're seeing more and more Illustrator AI images that contributors assume are turning out perfect results. They're not. These need a lot of point-by-point editing after the fact.
14
Replies
For the surfer, maybe the four fingers instead of five?
The surfer doesn't have enough fingers.
The lace on the cami isn't drawn properly.
The fingers and keyboard are flawed.
You must zoom in at least 100% on every image and carefully inspect. Edit out the flaws or delete the image.
About 200 Fox photos on the camera have been reviewed and released, so I think I understand quite important points, but I would appreciate it if you could tell me whether the judging rules in illustrations are different from photos.
By @yuichiy29972537
I suppose you did not check for the typical generative AI errors. Which proves, by the way, that you did not inspect your pictures at 100%. Generative AI is getting better, but it is still bad with some things, like hands, faces, geometric objects like knobs etc.
Quality requirements for AI and Photos are the same, but AI introduces other errors. You need to look for those before submitting.
みなさま、ご回答ありがとうございます。
AI生成された人物の場合、細心の注意を払わなければいけないことが理解できました。
追加で質問になります。
イラストアイコンについても「品質の問題」により却下をされてしまったのですが、却下の原因についてわかるでしょうか。
Zoom in and inspect carefully. The lines are jagged and poorly drawn.
A lot of weird shapes that don't make sense, croocked lines that should be straight. I haven't circuled all the issues but they are easy to spot at 100%. Seems we're seeing more and more Illustrator AI images that contributors assume are turning out perfect results. They're not. These need a lot of point-by-point editing after the fact.
Just looking at the first icon on the screen without even loading the file and checking in Photoshop:
1) Shadow, 2) and 3) filling error.
1) why this gap
2) looks like the back of the wheelchair, but chairs don't look like this.
3) what device is the person holding?
1) shadow, but no arm
2) four arms for the monster lady?
Fill errors or a badly drawn rollator.
At first, I asked myself what you wanted to show us with that toilet, but then I realized that it should be a completely ill-conceived assistance dog.
What you need to understand is that if you want to create icons, they should show immediately what this is about. Besides all the drawing errors, the icons are completely useless as this. It's easier to redraw them then to correct all the mistakes.
AdChoices