Account not tagging content as Ai Generated

[Saulo Collado]

I have no issue with AI-generated content as I create using both traditional and AI tools. However, I strongly believe that everyone who creates AI content should be held to the same standard.

This account has barely tagged any of its uploads, and it appears that almost all of its content is AI-generated. It seems that the account owner is doing this intentionally, as they tag some of the more obvious AI-generated pieces and then omit tagging others to gain more visibility on the site.

https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211284989/Isidro?asset_id=603545595

Some the the images in question linked bellow. 

https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211284989/Isidro?asset_id=603545595

https://stock.adobe.com/images/concept-of-business-partnerships-collaboration-creating-new-opportuni...

https://stock.adobe.com/images/vending-machine/572815876?prev_url=detail

https://stock.adobe.com/images/ev-electronic-vehicle-electric-hybrid-car-power-charging-station/5941...

[Saulo Collado]

Here another Account doing the same. They put it in the title but did not tag the content as ai.

Ids for images bellow. 

• 598050770
• 604047018
• 591755115
• 600976075
• 602053305

[Saulo Collado]

https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/211223232/Atchariya63

[Jill_C]

On the Buyer portal you cannot see the exact keywords that the Contributor entered, thus you can't know with any certainty whether or not they included "Generative" and "AI" among their keywords. What is shown are "Similar Keywords", but not the exact keywords entered on any particular image.

[Saulo Collado]

All Ai Images are supposed to have this bellow them. If they do not it means the contributor did not label it properly by hitting Created using generative AI tools. 

[Jill_C]

Yes, I know that. My point is that the keywords you see on the Buyer page for an image, are not exactly the keywords that the Contributor entered.

[Nancy OShea]

Maybe @WendellaBee will see this.

[Abambo]

This is more for @MatHayward to comment on. I think, some of the assets are tagged by Adobe's "AI recognition"-program. Some have issues that should have gotten the assets refused for technical issues. 

I too, I feel scammed, when the instructions are not followed correctly on a wide scale. That will make look contributors following the rules like clowns. However, we do not have insights into the stock database. The only thing you can do, to see if the asset is recognized as an generative AI asset, is to search for it with precise search strings and the flags for generative AI on and off.

[Nancy OShea]

In all fairness, the assets may have been submitted prior to the new AI requirements. 

If you come across any that are incorrectly tagged, report them to Stock and they'll handle it.

This user-to-user community can't do anything about it.

[Saulo Collado]

Ok I'll just send an Email to Adobe. They were submited after the Ai requirements going by the file number. Files starting with 560000000 date back to january.

[Abambo]

In all fairness, the assets may have been submitted prior to the new AI requirements. 

If you come across any that are incorrectly tagged, report them to Stock and they'll handle it.

This user-to-user community can't do anything about it.

By @Nancy OShea

You can see the approximative submission date with the asset number. Check your assets against the assets in a portfolio, and you will see the dates. Asset numbers are incremental. Anything with 56… and beyond is from 2023.