While my normal images get almost always approved, my AI images (generated via Midjourney, mostly version 6, upscaled directly in Midjourney, never using a reference image (except my own) or reference to other autors in the prompt) are often being refused for "quality issues". My impression is that the decisions about what is approved and what is rejected are sometimes completely random. I would really appreciate some feedback from the reviewers so that I don't waste my time and Midjourney credits but there isn't any. Could I ask what the problems with these images are? Thank you.
(I have uploaded 10 images below - there is more but 10 is maximum I can upload here. I had to reduce their size otherwise they couldn't be uploaded. I can imagine that with some of the images the problem could be in oversharpening that Midjourney does when upscaling, or that someone is worried about the gibberish numbers and letters written on the chip, but what is wrong with double exposure and glitch effect, or with a 3D generated brain, or with a message written on the screen of a computer? Especially when it is AI generated so it can hardly be a copyright protected font?)
4 Correct answers
I looked at several of the images and found the following issues:
- the man has no left hand and his right arm is too short; the woman on the right has only one leg.
- poorly drawn branches in the floral image
-" Bitcoin" is trademarked in the U.K. The coin is oval shaped.
For the chips, this could represent a quality issue:
The writing is less a problem, as it is clean, even if it is nonsense. The lanes on the board are also between good and bad. You do not look hard to find auality issues here.
Your brain has an aliasing problem.
(as a side note: checking assets takes a lot of time, and referring to assets gets complicated, when there are a lot of them. We would like to see peaple restricting to one to three assets. When everybody has commented on those
...
14
Replies
I looked at several of the images and found the following issues:
- the man has no left hand and his right arm is too short; the woman on the right has only one leg.
- poorly drawn branches in the floral image
-" Bitcoin" is trademarked in the U.K. The coin is oval shaped.
I wouldn't say the silhouette of the woman has just one leg - to me it's just one leg covered by the other as she is walking,
By @Madeleine24
Strange walk:
It just doesn't work.
As for Bitcoin: just because others ha assets passed, that won't guarantee you the same. Trademarks won't pass, but I think that the Bitcoin logo should pass on the IP grounds. Did the rejection reason mention IP?
I'm a bit confused because there are hundreds of thousands of bitcoin images on stock agencies including Adobe Stock. In any case, thank you for taking the time to answer!
By @Madeleine24
Those images may be editorial ones, or they may have been introduced before the trademarks got registered. There are several trademarks of several companies in obscure classes registered. Nevertheless, they are registered, and the registration owners are probably waiting for infringement.
Example of classes registered:
for a Spanish company the Bitcoin logo similar to your picture:
- 35 Business management; Business administration; Office functions; Distribution wholesale, Retail services, Catalogue mail order services and Selling via worldwide computer networks in relation to the following goods: Clothing, Footwear, headgear and headwear and Foodstuffs; Business advice relating to franchising; Business assistance relating to franchising; Providing assistance in the management of franchised businesses.
- 36 Real estate affairs.
For a French company the name Bitcoin. The company is in the parfum businesss:
- 3 Essential oils and aromatic extracts; Floral water; Aromatics [essential oils]; Fumigating incenses (Kunko); Ethereal oils; Natural essential oils; Essential oils for personal use; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Oils for perfumes and scents; Perfumery, essential oils; Aromatherapy preparations; Toiletries; Perfumery and fragrances; Body cleaning and beauty care preparations; Oral hygiene preparations; Massage candles for cosmetic purposes; Balms, other than for medical purposes; Eau de Cologne; Body deodorants [perfumery]; Perfumed creams; Scented body lotions and creams; Aromatherapy creams; Bases for flower perfumes; Cedarwood perfumery; Aromatics for perfumes; Aromatics for fragrances; Lavender water; Eau de parfum; Cleaning and fragrancing preparations; Vehicle cleaning preparations; Dishwasher rinsing agents; Drying agents for dishwashing machines; Stain removing agents; Anti-smear agents for cleaning purposes; Caustic cleaning agents; Leather and shoe cleaning and polishing preparations; Laundry preparations; Household fragrances; Cleaning agents for household purposes; Agents for removing wax; Canned pressurized air for cleaning and dusting purposes; Impregnated cloths for polishing.
A Delaware company, the name Bitcoin:
- 45 Domain name registration services.
I am not convinced that they hold the road and I assume that a serious challenge would get the registration(s) invalidated, but for the moment they have it registered, so any challenger would need to take cash in their hands to challenge that.
(As a side note: the number is the class that is claimed. For the class 45, the registrant limited the scope explicitly to domain name registration services, the class also contains interesting activities like legal and regulatory compliance auditing services, but also pet sitting, dog walking services and clothes rental. 😂)
For the chips, this could represent a quality issue:
The writing is less a problem, as it is clean, even if it is nonsense. The lanes on the board are also between good and bad. You do not look hard to find auality issues here.
Your brain has an aliasing problem.
(as a side note: checking assets takes a lot of time, and referring to assets gets complicated, when there are a lot of them. We would like to see peaple restricting to one to three assets. When everybody has commented on those three assets, you could ask follow-up questions, with a different aset. This helps us, saving time, and you, getting good advice on those images.)
I don't get how it is saving time to split the 10 selected images into 3-10 comments but I will do that next time, thanks.
Thanks for your feedback anyway.
By @Madeleine24
The trick is to get one or two assets commented on and then checking the other ones for similar errors or in a similar way, so that at the long, you do not need help to anymore to analyze refusals. Very often errors are of a similar nature, so this saves effectively time.
We are all contributors, so we know that editing and keywording takes time. But we are also volunteers for this. So we are doing this in our free time.
Sorry for having uploaded 1 batch of images for feedback in 7 years of being a contributor... 🙂
By @Madeleine24
You're welcome to ask. I (others too) just normally don't comment on more than three. And I find it more difficult to address the pictures, when there are a lot.
But for you too, it is better to limit the number of postings. As we ask for the files as submitted, they start getting into the public with a posting here. It's not a closed group, with restricted access. But we need unmodified assets to be able to comment. So the less you post, the more you're learning, the better it is for you.
I'm sorry to disappoint you. I don't know how to use it. I didn't knowbefore. I will reduce the size and not overwrite the hole.I miss you andmiss you the most.
By @Hwaenthong33712475q9iq
Irrelevant comment. Please abstain from this.
    
AdChoices