Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Apologies for yet another release question but file id:528974262 - which is a AI generated surreal digital painting (not photo realistic)
...has been rejected even though I created a property release - I filled in my artist name, signature and contact details in both sections (property owner and property information)
-The review came back stating "We can't accept your image into our collection until you provide a completed and correct model release and/or property release."
Attached is a small low res sample of the image:
Should I have perhaps filled in and completed the "Description & Location" input field and write and decribe that it is Artificial Intelligence generated digital art?
There is obviously no real person to contact for a model release and I have filled in that I am the rights owner and artist of it but perhaps without specifically mentioning this in property release Adobe might worry it is stolen work from another artist?
Also, is there any future keywords or specific words I need to use in decription along with property release that can help the reviewers approve it wihout concerns?
Well, it's not obvious that there was no real person standing model for this picture. So, the moderator asks for a model release. You absolutely need to make clear in the property release, that the artwork was not modelled after a living person.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I don't think you should have left the field blank. What you propose sounds a good description. They MIGHT be hankering after a model release too, which is a problem.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Well, it's not obvious that there was no real person standing model for this picture. So, the moderator asks for a model release. You absolutely need to make clear in the property release, that the artwork was not modelled after a living person.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Running into the same issue!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Same issue same solution.