AI refusal is not accepted by moderators

[Denis5FBC]

Can someone tell me why I have so many rejections for AI images? I used mid-journey, I made 10 images per type 1 promnt, I looked at other popular bloggers for authors and Adobe stock analytics, and out of 390, less than 100 were accepted, this is very It’s a sad waste of a lot of time and I’m very upset by this approach of the moderators, I would be very grateful if anyone knows how to solve this problem or what to do for a higher percentage of content acceptance.  

In addition, I’ll say, maybe I don’t understand something, but when they don’t accept images on the theme of New Year and Christmas, then I completely fell, how can I not accept something that is currently in demand, why do they reject such images?

I added a small part of what was not accepted

[George_F]

Even with AI generated abstract images, I would expect the ones that have obvious generation flaws to be rejected.  That's the point that you should take from this.  There were generation errors in all 10 of your images, and it took only a few seconds to find them.

I think @RALPH_L made a great point.  Instead of submitting 100 photos with errors, try put your efforts into 10 photos that have been thoroughly inspected and the errors corrected.  

Genuinely, I wish you good luck with your future submissions.

[Nancy OShea]

AI is only a tool.  It's not a replacement for human knowledge, talent & skill. 

Unlike AI,  humans learn from their mistakes and correct them.  AI doesn't know what mistakes it makes or how to correct them.  It does only what it's told to do by humans.

Enroll in some design & editing courses. It will be time well-spent.

[Abambo]

What is Toko 10? 

What is this? 

It takes a second to refuse this asset. You even do not need to check the lantern's geometry. The DOF is too swallow. The asset does not make a sense, visually. A picture with such a perspective needs to have more DOF, or there need to be a POI sharp in the image, like a person or an animal ore more than one person… The picture above is useless. 

You do not need to be AI to refuse.

[Jill_C]

I looked at just 1 image, the last one, and saw many generated errors in the shapes of the ornaments, the ribbons and bows, etc. 

[Denis5FBC]

I randomly chose images from all of them that were rejected for me, here you can set only 10, and I didn’t say that they were ideal, give me an answer, what then with images like abstractions, what didn’t you like? As I understand it, someone doesn’t check them, they look at 1 or 2 and reject them at 300-400? 

[Abambo]

I randomly chose images from all of them that were rejected for me, here you can set only 10, and I didn’t say that they were ideal, give me an answer, what then with images like abstractions, what didn’t you like? As I understand it, someone doesn’t check them, they look at 1 or 2 and reject them at 300-400? 

By @Denis5FBC

You understand it wrong. Every rejected asset got checked. But only for the first issue. There is no need to look further. With some (most?) of your assets, I even do not need a second to detect errors. And as moderators do not need to write reports, they are very good at refusing 100 assets in 5 minutes. 

[Festive_epicness157F]

But listen, Denis. There are gross errors in all your pictures. In the abstracts, the circles are e.g. not round. It will be weird if the only pictures you've shown here have errors. As others have mentioned, create five 'perfect' pictures instead of a hundred imperfect ones. If everyone did that, it would all go a lot better.

[RALPH_L]

@Denis5FBC the point is the idea for the images are good but, you can not rely on the AI to produce perfect images that customrs are willing to pay money for. Take the time to cleanup the images. Here is another example of the poor quality in your images.

  

[Denis5FBC]

I completely agree if the moderators see the exact problems and refuse for specific reasons, I have nothing against it. I have nothing against it. BUT when they refuse illustrations and abstractions as a background, then my question is how can you check what exactly is in the abstract??? and there will be the same failure rate as with the interer, etc., it’s just not funny. 

[George_F]

With all of your abstract images, the histograms on almost all of them are skewed towards underexposure and they have a simulated shallow depth of field leaving quite a bit of the image blurry.

Images with dark histograms usually don't print very well, and a shallow depth of field limits their usefulness as someone can easily apply blur in Photoshop, but can't sharpen a blurry image nearly as easily.

When searching for an asset for a project, I typically search for a sharp asset that I can blur to match the rest of my project.  I would pass on all of these, not because I don't like them but because they aren't useful to me in a commercial setting.

Keep in mind that you've asked for our opinions and we're giving them to you in the hopes that it's helpful.  Taking criticism is never easy but I hope you consider them with an open mind.  Cheers!

[RALPH_L]

On all of your abstract cubes there are several errors with the vertical lines. Many are round. Also the lighting is not always from the same perspective.  Another thing, png is to have a transparent background otherwise you are to use jpg.

[Abambo]

Abstract does not mean without rules: 

...and especially abstract is not an excuse for artefacts.

[Abambo]

Snow blurred background: no DOF and this:

[Nancy OShea]

1.  Abstracts are not big sellers. Besides, Stock has over 57 million of them (more than they can sell).

You're competing with way too much inventory.   Save the abstracts for your own projects.

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=abstract

2.  AI art is inherently flawed — bad geometry, competing light sources, poorly drawn details and other artifacts that make it unfit for commercial projects.  It takes a talented artist to see the flaws and make all necessary corrections prior to submission.   If you can do it, great.  If you can't, then take some courses to learn how.

3.  Sure, Adobe Stock could give a wholesale pass to every submission until customers complain and demand refunds.  But eventually customers would stop coming here & Stock would be out of business real fast.  Where would contributors go?  Back to a 9 to 5 job.