Batch... rejection !!!

[alainp67667666]

I wonder why all these photos have been rejected, arguing a technical problem. Where is the problem ? I am a contributor for many years and it is the first time that all the photos of a batch are rejected.
Thank you for your aswer

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

DZC_1245: underexposed, noisy, out of focus.

DZC_1167:

• is underexposed,
  
• has too much noise reduction applied,
• has IP problems

DZC_1114: Is slightly underexposed, but I am not convinced that this is the problem. The eyes of the butterfly are slightly out of focus. 

DZC_1270: lighten shadows, add sharpening and texture/clarity.

[alainp67667666]

I'm surprised to find that DZC_1114 have finally been approuved 3 hours ago.
Otherwise, I'll send you correctedversions of DZC_1245 and DZC_1270. I agree concerning the trade mark that appears on DZC_1167.
And what about the rejection of my 4 other photos ?

[Nancy OShea]

Please don't ask us to critique more than 2-3 images per post.   We are unpaid forum volunteers and fellow product users like you. 

Re-read the Stock Contributor User Guide:

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

[Abambo]

And what about the rejection of my 4 other photos ?

By @alainp67667666

I didn't look into those. Normally, errors are similar and after a while, contributors know where to look. 😉

[RALPH_L]

Photo 1 lacks contrast and color and is too soft.

Photo 2 has a bird which needs to be removed, is out of focus and underexposed shadows.

[jacquelingphoto2017 · Accepted solution]

Hi @alainp67667666,

Your subjects are nice and I do like your composition. File ending with 1303 is underexposed and there is an IP issue. The text across the building towards the left. Image ending 1227 and 1228 have brighter exposure - depending on who reviews them they could be considered a bit overexposed. There is one common issue I find with all three photos, they are not that sharp. I believe you might have incorrect settings for landscape photography thus getting a bit shallow result. 

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[reedesign1912]

When reviewing some of your images at 100% magnification, I noticed sensor / dust spots on 1227 and 1228.  Oddly, I also see what appears to be a dead pixel in 1227, but I don't see it in 1228.  I have highlighted some of the spots in the screenshots.