brak znawcy od zdjęć

[arczi567]

No to juz jest chamstwo!!

wrzuciłem na stock zdjęcia z celowa nieostrością (kbokeh) a oni mi wszystkie odrzucili. Juz nawet nie chce mi sie tego tłumaczyć - buraki

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

The pendulum swings both ways.   I think it's rude to offer blurry photos to paying customers who want crisp, sharp details they can use in commercial print projects.  Emphasis on commercial. 

Stock is not social media.  It's a business.  Stock customers expect highest visual and technical quality. Nothing less will do.  If you're new to Stock, read the Contributor User Guide.  There is much good information there to help you.   🙂

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/vector-requirements.html

If you want feedback, post one or two full-sized images here along with the rejection reason.  We're here to help you.  We want you to succeed.

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

From the Adobe Stock Help page:

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Quality overview

"In general, images and video should be in focus and well-lit with no signs of artifacts. Vectors should be organized and filled shape paths should be closed. Some content may look great in an art gallery but isn’t ideal for stock. Before you upload content, ask yourself how it can be used commercially. If you were a customer, would you buy the image? If the answer is yes, think about what you would use it for."

Indeed, intentional blur is a very useful and often pretty artistic tool, but too much of the frame out of blur is not what Adobe Stock is looking for.

Feel free to upload a couple of samples of your rejected images here in full resolution if you wish the contributor community here to lend their opinions as to the reason for rejection. Sometimes it's not what you think...

[TomekPLKTW]

Zgadzam się. Wypierdzielono mi kilkadziesiąt ostrych zdjęć ptaków. W przypadku takiej fotografii tło jest zawsze rozmyte 😁 powód odrzuceń "problemy z jakością". Ul. Żałosny poziom amatorów...

[Jill_C]

As indicated on your other post, you are welcome to upload a couple of your rejected images here to receive input as to the possible reasons for rejection. Moderators are human and they do occasionally makes mistakes; however, in general, we find that the vast majority of rejected images submitted here do actually contain detectable quality issues.  Moderators are trained and they are not "amateurs". 

[Abambo]

 I have had dozens of sharp photos of birds rejected. With such photography the background is always blurred reason for rejections "quality issues". The pitiful level of amateurs....

By @TomekPLKTW

It may well be that the rejection reason is not bokeh. But without seeing the assets, none can help you. In most of the cases that we see here, we can confirm that the refusal is well-earned.

[Abambo]

I uploaded photos to stock with intentional out-of-focus (bokeh) and they all rejected me.

By @arczi567

It may well be that the rejection reason is not bokeh. But without seeing the assets, none can help you.