can some one help me out, everything i upload seems to get rejected, in other places it sales..

[robertog7059715]

[robertog7059715]

the only thing i can think of is they are too dark... they are night shots.... want it to look like day? distortion? ut us fush eye, so it is hard to not have distortion?, i dont see noise nor artifacts,  i would say, camera quality?  but i have a hand help best of the best camera and my images get rejected, again they sell no problem on other places, my name?

[daniellei4510]

The lighting could very well be an issue in terms of being suitable for stock. Especially the last one.

[Abambo]

The last is indeed underexposed, and it has IP issues, as the sculpture is the centre of interest, and there is at least one logo left on the right of the picture.

[robertog7059715]

you mean on the first picture?

[Abambo]

The last.

[Abambo]

That is an IP issues.

[robertog7059715]

yes, thank you very much,

[Abambo]

What was the refusal reason? What about a lack of sharpness. Your first is only sharp in the middle. And you have IP violations.

[robertog7059715]

it said quality issues

[robertog7059715]

sharpness is the same all across the image as it is like 9 image panorama, i did notice a logo on the first one, but it did not says that was the reason to be rejected, so i am guessing just like you are

[Abambo]

Well it said quality. I have no idea how you took the panorama, but it is a fact that the focus is getting off, when you go to the borders. That may be your DOF, that may be something other. I won't buy a picture that is out of focus in important parts of the picture. If sharpness is the same in all pictures, all pictures lack sharpness on the borders, well anything that is not in the middle, so the out of focus regions are quite big. That is a quality issue.

IP issues is a different refusal. Moderators refuse on the first issue they see. So that first was not the logo. But if you get the picture's quality right, which is difficult with focus issues, you would earn a refusal for IP. It's that simple. When I'm looking at a picture, I tend to mention every defect, not only one. 

[robertog7059715]

thanks for the time and the replay, yes it is hard to guess when they dont specify a  single reason, i would understand if this drone i am starting to use would not meet the quality standard of adobe, others do i checked,  but my problem has been increasing with adobe, i would drive alot for what was my main job, i would take editorial landscaps of all the small towns i crossed, and they would be accepted almost 100% then nothing changed my rutin was the same and my quality was the same, suddently  100% rejection, and is frustrating because my photos sell for cents every where, and adobe was my 3rd earner, to think i would be making like 4 times what i make right now on adobe, some of my photos are the best sellers on their subjects, as i photograph small of the road towns, i am going to start traveling to every corner of mexico, many places they dont even have a picture of, if they dont specify what they want me to change, well they will miss out on that, any one else having this issue of before 100% accepted to 0%?  oh i would normally only summit editorial so, having ip violations is not an issue

[Abambo]

, yes it is hard to guess when they dont specify a  single reason,

By @robertog7059715

They say "quality issues". But it's not the tool they judge, but the result. The panoramic pictures are nice, but if you would concentrate more on one thing, like the building, it would be easier to get it through. You may need to split your work. Do these pictures for other stock agencies, take a less wide approach for Adobe stock. 

Your last definitly has an exposure issue. You could correct and resubmit as editorial use only. 

Editorial use only pictures have limited use, so you need to have the usability in mind. Who would need the picture?

Having pictures that can be used commercially gives you a wider customer base.

[robertog7059715]

Yes that is exactly what i am doing, i already adjust a little the exp. and i have summit them as editorial, lets see what happens, i wont bother to upload for commercial for now, any ways when there is a big costumer they will ask if they can modify it them selves

[Abambo]

i wont bother to upload for commercial for now, any ways when there is a big costumer they will ask if they can modify it them selves

By @robertog7059715

That's not how it works. Editorial use only pictures cannot be modified, except minor cropping. I'm even not sure if anyone can crop to standard format, as that is no more minor...

[robertog7059715]

oh i ment in other places, they will contact you and ask for permission to turn your editorial photo into commercial, it has happen to me a handfull of times

[Abambo]

That does not happen on Adobe stock, however. There is a reason why an asset is editorial use only.