Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The first image was accepted the second was not. I have other similar examples of this and am trying to figure out why as half of my images approved and half were rejected, many of which were part of a series.
It's possible that your assets were reviewed by different Moderators. Based on some geometry errors and non-sensical objects, both images should have been rejected. Some, but not all, of the errors highlighted below.
I agree, both images should have been rejected.
You should ask why the first one got accepted, not why the second one got rejected. The second one really has issues like this:
@daniellei4510 wrote:
I as well have had similar ones accepted and similar ones rejected. With assets like these, it appears to be a tolerance issue on the part of the moderators. What some find acceptable given the style in question, others find unacceptable errors.
I would say that there were 2 moderators checking this. And this is not a tolerance issue, but more a training issue. Or a distraction issue. Or a "being tired" issue. Obviously, even the preview shows clearly multiple errors:
Is it just me, or is the girl in a cap wearing a face mask? And her hands are malformed.
This is very poor AI rendering. Which service did you use?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It's possible that your assets were reviewed by different Moderators. Based on some geometry errors and non-sensical objects, both images should have been rejected. Some, but not all, of the errors highlighted below.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I agree, both images should have been rejected.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I as well have had similar ones accepted and similar ones rejected. With assets like these, it appears to be a tolerance issue on the part of the moderators. What some find acceptable given the style in question, others find unacceptable errors.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@daniellei4510 wrote:
I as well have had similar ones accepted and similar ones rejected. With assets like these, it appears to be a tolerance issue on the part of the moderators. What some find acceptable given the style in question, others find unacceptable errors.
I would say that there were 2 moderators checking this. And this is not a tolerance issue, but more a training issue. Or a distraction issue. Or a "being tired" issue. Obviously, even the preview shows clearly multiple errors:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You should ask why the first one got accepted, not why the second one got rejected. The second one really has issues like this:
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It could certainly be the 'titles' on the books in the upper left corner.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Is it just me, or is the girl in a cap wearing a face mask? And her hands are malformed.
This is very poor AI rendering. Which service did you use?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Midjourney and this is obviously an interpretation of a style of illustration. Does anyone know if Adobe Stock ever does a Mass audit of the existing images available. Because this isn't even as egregious as many of the images on the platform. If I painted an illustration that had technical errors but that was my style or even let's just pretend "in the style of PIcasso" where geometry is unconventional would that get rejected as well?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Well, for starters, it is against the T&Cs to prompt something like, "in the style of Picasso," but I assume you were using this as an example.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It seems highly subjective. Based on the feedback I would say its more pertaining to artifacts in the image. If someone has an illustration where angles aren't "perfect" I really don't see why that's an issue. This is an illustration, not a photograph.